United States v. Huck Manufacturing Co
Decision Date | 01 October 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 8,8 |
Parties | UNITED STATES, appellant, v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Donald F. Turner, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Dennis G. Lyons, Washington, D. C., and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
Assistant Attorney General Turner (Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel, on the brief), for the United States.
Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr. (Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr., on the brief), for appellees.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle
...at 285-88.13 United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 68 S.Ct. 550, 92 L.Ed. 701 (1948); United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965), aff'g 227 F.Supp. 791 (E.D.Mich.1964).14 See also United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 68 S.Ct. 5......
-
Bela Seating Company v. Poloron Products, Inc.
...United States v. Huck Manufacturing Company, 227 F.Supp. 791, 800, 803, 804 (E.D.Mich., 1964), aff'd per curiam 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965); United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 118 F.Supp. 41, 224 (D.Del., 1953), aff'd 351 U.S. 377, 76 S.Ct. 994, 100 L. Ed......
-
Munters Corp. v. Burgess Industries Inc.
...Rev. 423, 456-57 (1966), and the Supreme Court has come close to overruling it on several occasions. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965), aff'g by an equally divided Court 227 F.Supp. 791 (E.D.Mich.1964); United States v. Line Material Co., 333 ......
-
City of Greeley v. Poudre Valley Rural Elec. Ass'n, Inc., 85SA293
... ... The final paragraph of the PUC decision states: ... Home Light contends ... that it obtained a ... ...
-
Vertical Restraints
...or process to the company . . . such provisions . . . are prohibited by the antitrust laws.”). 147. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197 (1965); Line Material , 333 U.S. at 287. 168 Handbook on Antitrust in Technology Industries Despite the erosion of support for the General Electri......
-
Patents
...LAW DEVELOPMENTS 1070-71 (7th ed. 2012). 2. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 227 F. Supp. 791, 804 (E.D. Mich. 1964), aff’d per curiam , 382 U.S. 197 (1965); U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE & FEDERAL TRADE COMM’N, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR THE LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY §§ 5.6 (1995)[hereinafte......
-
Table of Cases
...Co. Ltd v. ZTE Corp., Case C-170/13, ZTE Deutschland GmbH,2015 E.C.R. 477 (EUR. Ct. Justice), 344, 366 Huck Mfg. Co.; United States v., 382 U.S. 197 (1965), 167 Hull v. Brunswick corp., 704 F.2d 1195 (10th Cir. 1983), 310 Hutchison 3G UK/Telefònica Ireland, Case COMP/M.6992, Comm’n Decision......
-
United States Law and the Proposed Code of Conduct on the Transfer of Technology
...caseshave sharply limited. While it has not overruled the GeneralElectric precedent (see United States v. Huck ManufacturingCo.et al., 382 U.S. 197(1965),affirming by an equallydivided Court, 227 F. Supp. 791), the Supreme court has heldthat, where there is price fixing in the context of cr......