United States v. Huck Manufacturing Co

Decision Date01 October 1965
Docket NumberNo. 8,8
PartiesUNITED STATES, appellant, v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Donald F. Turner, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Dennis G. Lyons, Washington, D. C., and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Assistant Attorney General Turner (Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel, on the brief), for the United States.

Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr. (Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr., on the brief), for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • U.S. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • December 11, 1981
    ...at 285-88.13 United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 68 S.Ct. 550, 92 L.Ed. 701 (1948); United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965), aff'g 227 F.Supp. 791 (E.D.Mich.1964).14 See also United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 68 S.Ct. 5......
  • Bela Seating Company v. Poloron Products, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • December 23, 1968
    ...United States v. Huck Manufacturing Company, 227 F.Supp. 791, 800, 803, 804 (E.D.Mich., 1964), aff'd per curiam 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965); United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 118 F.Supp. 41, 224 (D.Del., 1953), aff'd 351 U.S. 377, 76 S.Ct. 994, 100 L. Ed......
  • Munters Corp. v. Burgess Industries Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 7, 1978
    ...Rev. 423, 456-57 (1966), and the Supreme Court has come close to overruling it on several occasions. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197, 86 S.Ct. 385, 15 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965), aff'g by an equally divided Court 227 F.Supp. 791 (E.D.Mich.1964); United States v. Line Material Co., 333 ......
  • City of Greeley v. Poudre Valley Rural Elec. Ass'n, Inc., 85SA293
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1987
    ... ... The final paragraph of the PUC decision states: ...         Home Light contends ... that it obtained a ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • Vertical Restraints
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Handbook on Antitrust in Technology Industries
    • December 5, 2017
    ...or process to the company . . . such provisions . . . are prohibited by the antitrust laws.”). 147. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 382 U.S. 197 (1965); Line Material , 333 U.S. at 287. 168 Handbook on Antitrust in Technology Industries Despite the erosion of support for the General Electri......
  • Patents
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Model Jury Instructions in Civil Antitrust Cases
    • December 8, 2016
    ...LAW DEVELOPMENTS 1070-71 (7th ed. 2012). 2. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co., 227 F. Supp. 791, 804 (E.D. Mich. 1964), aff’d per curiam , 382 U.S. 197 (1965); U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE & FEDERAL TRADE COMM’N, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR THE LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY §§ 5.6 (1995)[hereinafte......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Handbook on Antitrust in Technology Industries
    • December 5, 2017
    ...Co. Ltd v. ZTE Corp., Case C-170/13, ZTE Deutschland GmbH,2015 E.C.R. 477 (EUR. Ct. Justice), 344, 366 Huck Mfg. Co.; United States v., 382 U.S. 197 (1965), 167 Hull v. Brunswick corp., 704 F.2d 1195 (10th Cir. 1983), 310 Hutchison 3G UK/Telefònica Ireland, Case COMP/M.6992, Comm’n Decision......
  • United States Law and the Proposed Code of Conduct on the Transfer of Technology
    • United States
    • Antitrust Bulletin No. 23-4, December 1978
    • December 1, 1978
    ...caseshave sharply limited. While it has not overruled the GeneralElectric precedent (see United States v. Huck ManufacturingCo.et al., 382 U.S. 197(1965),affirming by an equallydivided Court, 227 F. Supp. 791), the Supreme court has heldthat, where there is price fixing in the context of cr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT