United States v. Hunton
| Decision Date | 17 July 1951 |
| Citation | 190 F.2d 556 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. HUNTON et al. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Victor Rabinowitz and Mary Kaufman, New York City, for appellants.
Irving Saypol, New York City, for appellee.
I have read Judge Swan's opinion, disposing of a similar motion in the case of United States v. Field, 2 Cir., 190 F.2d 554, filed herewith, and I concur in it throughout except as to the last question therein considered, which does not arise on the motions before me.
The Clerk of the Court of Appeals upon the filing of this opinion will enter orders, revoking my order temporarily enlarging the defendants on bail, and will enter orders denying these motions.
Motions denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
United States v. Field
...Cir., 190 F.2d 554; and this was concurred in by Judge L. Hand in denying similar applications by Hammett and Hunton, United States v. Hunton et al., 2 Cir., 190 F.2d 556. Thereafter all three made like petitions before Justice Reed as Acting Circuit Justice for the circuit. Justice Reed de......
- United States v. Field
-
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.
... ... NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ... WESTEX BOOT & SHOE CO ... No. 13402 ... United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ... August 14, 1951. Maurice Alexandre, ... ...