United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 10187.
| Decision Date | 18 January 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 10187.,10187. |
| Citation | 187 F.2d 374 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. et al. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Roger P. Marquis, Fred W. Smith, A. Devitt Vanech, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., William W. Hart, U. S. Atty., Ernest R. McHale, Asst. U. S. Atty. East St. Louis, Ill. for appellant.
Timothy G. Lowry, Owen Rall, and Charles A. Helsell, all of Chicago, Ill., C. E. Feirich, Carbondale, Ill., Bruce Campbell, East St. Louis, Ill. (V. W. Foster, Chicago, Ill., Feirich & Feirich, Carbondale, Ill., Kramer, Campbell, Costello & Wiechert, East St. Louis, Ill., Eckert, Peterson & Leeming, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and KERNER and FINNEGAN, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action to enjoin the Illinois Central Railroad Company from alienating or disposing of gas, oil, or other minerals, underlying any part of its railroad right of way and to enjoin the railroad and defendant, Menhall, the railroad's lessee, from extracting gas and oil under the right of way except under a lease issued by the Secretary of the Interior under the Act of May 21, 1930, 46 Stat. 373, 30 U.S. C.A. § 301 et seq. The District Court dismissed the action on the ground that the railroad had the right to extract and sell the oil from its right of way.
The railroad received its title by a conveyance from the State of Illinois acting under and pursuant to the Act of Congress of September 20, 1850, 9 Stat. 466. That Act was a grant of lands from the United States to the State of Illinois to aid in the construction of a railroad. On February 10, 1851, the State of Illinois granted the land involved in this case to the Illinois Central Railroad Company. The deed from the State of Illinois to the railroad was "for the purpose of securing construction of said Rail Road * * * To Have and to Hold in fee simple all and singular the above granted and described premises with the appurtenances thereunto belonging to the said Illinois Central Rail Road Company * * *." It was stipulated that the extraction of the oil in no way interfered with the operation of the railroad or the use of its right of way for railroad purposes.
The District Court concluded that the railroad held a limited fee subject to an implied condition of reverter in the event it ceased to use or retain the right of way for the purpose for which it was granted and that the railroad by...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
...grant made to the Illinois Central by the Act of 1850, 9 Stat. 466. United States v. Illinois Central R. Co., 89 F.Supp. 17, affirmed 7 Cir., 187 F.2d 374.5 To argue that the 'limited fee' that the long, unbroken line of cases found in the right of way grant in these enactments of the '60's......
-
City of Maroa v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 4-91-0736
...was approved in a per curiam decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. (United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. (7th Cir.1951), 187 F.2d 374, 375.) Curiously, a half century later, IC asks a State court to rule that two Federal courts misconstrued a Federal stat......
-
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
...The effect of the Great Northern case was discussed in United States v. Illinois Central R. Co., D.C., 89 F.Supp. 17, 23, affirmed 7 Cir., 187 F.2d 374. In a well-considered opinion, it was held that "on the authority of the Northern Pacific case," the Illinois Central, under a grant prior ......
-
Carlson v. United States
... ... 525, 544, 33 S.Ct. 141, 57 L.Ed. 333. See also Swift & Co ... ...