United States v. Ingraham
Decision Date | 04 February 1892 |
Citation | 49 F. 155 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. INGRAHAM. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island |
Rathbone Gardner, Dist. Atty., for the United States.
Franklin P. Owen, for defendant.
This is a motion in arrest of judgment after verdict on an indictment under section 5438 of the Revised Statutes, which is as follows:
etc.
The language of the indictment, so far as it is pertinent to the questions raised by this motion, is as follows: In the first count--
'That Royal Ingraham * * * did knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully make and present, and cause to be made and presented, for payment and approval, to the third auditor of the treasury department of the United States of America, a certain claim against the government of the United States.'
-- And in the second count--
'That said Royal Ingraham, * * * for the purpose of obtaining and aiding to obtain the payment and approval of a certain claim against the government of the United States, to-wit,' etc., ' * * * did knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully use and cause to be used a certain false affidavit, to-wit, the affidavit of one Perry Ingraham and one Mary E. Ingraham, ** * subscribed and sworn to on the ninth day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety, before Daniel H. Remington, a justice of the peace, he, the said Royal Ingraham, then and there well knowing the said affidavit to contain a fraudulent and fictitious statement, to-wit,' etc.
The motion in arrest of judgment is based upon the following grounds: (1) That the first count is uncertain and charges no offense, in that it does not set forth that the third auditor of the treasury department of the United...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Swan
... ... (People v. Carolan, ... 71 Cal. 195.) It was said in the case of United States v ... Ambrose, 2 F. 764: "It is sufficient to charge a ... presentation to the first ... naming the person who held the office." (United States ... v. Ingraham, 49 F. 155.) ... The ... fact that no skins or scalps were exhibited or that the ... ...
-
Williams v. Territory of Arizona
... ... altered, forged, or counterfeit.'" United States ... v. Staats, 8 How. 41, 12 L.Ed. 979 ... False ... affidavit: "Relates to the ... qualified nor the oath administered, nor the paper ... forged." United States v. Ingraham (C.C.), 49 ... False ... bank note: A forged paper in the similitude of a bank note or ... ...