United States v. Irving, 12072.
| Decision Date | 27 June 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 12072.,12072. |
| Citation | United States v. Irving, 245 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1957) |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James D. IRVING, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Harry G. Fins, Alvin A. Turner, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Robert Tieken, U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Earlier this year we affirmed the judgment of conviction of Irving United States v. Irving, 7 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 306, rehearing deniedMarch 14, 1957, certiorari denied 77 S.Ct. 1283 who now applies for an order admitting him to bail pending his appeal from an order entered below denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.The cause is here on the docketing of Irving's notice of appeal June 24, 1957 after the district judge, who rejected the motion for new trial, denied bail.He was the same judge who presided at Irving's trial.
During the course of our opinion (241 F.2d 306, 307)we said, inter alia:Irving, in his current motion states "During the course of preparation for his trial, the affiant diligently attempted to locate two receipts whereby he acknowledged the receipt of a total of $150,000 in September 1951 from Robert Mays * * *."Judgment on the jury's verdict was entered May 28, 1956.In his affidavit, submitted in support of his current application for bail, Irving states: "The affiant Irving did not know of the whereabouts of these receipts until Mr. Edward L. White telephoned him on September 12, 1956 to advise him that these receipts were found among other papers which belonged to Robert Mays and were placed in Mr. White's safe."The balance of this affidavit is devoted to an exposition of the circumstances concerning Mays' proposed investment in business with Irving and the death of Mays in January, 1952.Several other affidavits are also submitted along with this motion for admission to bail.One is by an attorney who in substance relates discussion of the proposed business venture with Mays and Irving, but this affidavit contains nothing corroborating the receipts, nor showing transfer of funds from Mays to Irving.The supervisor of the Division of Small Loans and Bail Bonds, Department of Insurance, State of Illinois has also provided an affidavit here.His is a highly generalized statement reflecting conferences with Mays and Irving, there being other persons present, regarding issuance of a small loans license.Again the affidavit is unsupporting on the matter of receipts or movement of moneys from Mays to Irving.These last two affidavits merely indicate that Irving and Mays contemplated the possibilities of a joint business venture.
Edward L. White, finder of the receipts, now urgently pressed on us by Irving, has also made an affidavit, tracing his own business activities and shifts of locations up to the time he called a representative of the Mosler Safe Company to drill open the safe, September 12, 1956, in which these receipts were found.Among White's statements embodied in his affidavit are these:
The indictment on which Irving was convicted is grounded on a violation of Internal Revenue Code of 1939, § 145(b),26 U.S.C. § 145(b) for the calendar year 1952.This was a net worth case and the government introduced as an exhibit the statement of Irving's assets and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
United States v. Esters, Crim. No. 4349.
...States, 76 S.Ct. 1063, 1 L.Ed.2d 25; and the opinion of Judge Finnegan of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Irving, 245 F.2d 354. In his opinion in the Ward case, supra, Justice Frankfurter pointed out that the amendment to Rule 46(a) (2) "effectuates a shift ......