United States v. Jackson

Docket Number19-6288
Decision Date10 March 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
395 cases
  • United States v. Eccleston
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • June 10, 2021
    ...even though the Commission has not had a quorum and has not changed the Policy Statement language. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 501 (4th Cir. 2020) (affirming the district court's consideration of a policy statement in a First Step Act case where the court "appropriate......
  • United States v. Gonzales
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • June 1, 2021
    ...even though the Commission has not had a quorum and has not changed the Policy Statement language. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 501 (4th Cir. 2020) (affirming the district court's consideration of a policy statement in a First Step Act case where the court "appropriate......
  • United States v. Martin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 3, 2020
    ...time would be appropriate here.The practice of crediting time served occurs in several contexts. See generally United States v. Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 497–98 (4th Cir. 2020). Most frequently, "[ 18 U.S.C.] § 3585(b) reduces a defendant's ‘imprisonment’ by the amount of time spent in ‘offic......
  • United States v. Snipes
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • October 25, 2022
    ...522, 526 (2011). One such exception is when the modification is “expressly permitted by statute.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B); see Jackson, 952 F.3d at 495. termed the “compassionate release” provision, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) provides a statutory vehicle to modify a defendant's sentence......
  • Get Started for Free