United States v. James, No. 71-1168

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
Writing for the CourtROBB, Circuit
Citation494 F.2d 1007
PartiesUNITED STATES of America v. Leon JAMES, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Enrico TANTILLO, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Robert VERDEROSA, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Lawrence W. JACKSON, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Carl W. BROOKS, Appellant.
Docket Number72-1488,71-1215,72-1489,72-1483,71-1192,71-1216.,71-1193,No. 71-1168
Decision Date04 February 1974
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
94 practice notes
  • State v. DeMartin
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • September 7, 1976
    ...95 S.Ct. 1136, 43 L.Ed.2d 405; United States v. Martinez, 498 F.2d 464, 467-68 (6th Cir.); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 494 F.2d 1007, 1013; United States v. Cox, 462 F.2d Page 1046 1293 (8th Cir.); United States v. Cox, 449 F.2d 679 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934, ......
  • United States v. Chiarizio, Crim. No. H-74-51.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • January 21, 1975
    ...F.2d 35 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 2623, 41 L.Ed.2d 223 (1974); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 494 F.2d 1007 (1974); United States v. Cafero, 473 F.2d 489 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 2622, 41 L.Ed.2d 223 (1974); United States ......
  • U.S. v. Davis, No. 75-1374
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • April 6, 1977
    ...had been handled in the apartment and particularly in the area of the scales. See United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 112, 494 F.2d 1007, 1031, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020, 95 S.Ct. 495, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974); Williams v. United States, 55 U.S.App.D.C. 239, 4 F.2d 432 (1925). There......
  • U.S. v. Williams, Nos. 83-1642
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • July 12, 1984
    ...See id. at 140-41, 98 S.Ct. at 1724-25; United States v. Quintana, 508 F.2d 867, 874 (7th Cir.1975); United States v. James, 494 F.2d 1007, 1019 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020, 95 S.Ct. 495, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 The defendants do make a distinction between intercepting conversations and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
94 cases
  • State v. DeMartin
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • September 7, 1976
    ...95 S.Ct. 1136, 43 L.Ed.2d 405; United States v. Martinez, 498 F.2d 464, 467-68 (6th Cir.); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 494 F.2d 1007, 1013; United States v. Cox, 462 F.2d Page 1046 1293 (8th Cir.); United States v. Cox, 449 F.2d 679 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934, ......
  • United States v. Chiarizio, Crim. No. H-74-51.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • January 21, 1975
    ...F.2d 35 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 2623, 41 L.Ed.2d 223 (1974); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 494 F.2d 1007 (1974); United States v. Cafero, 473 F.2d 489 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 2622, 41 L.Ed.2d 223 (1974); United States ......
  • U.S. v. Davis, No. 75-1374
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • April 6, 1977
    ...had been handled in the apartment and particularly in the area of the scales. See United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88, 112, 494 F.2d 1007, 1031, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020, 95 S.Ct. 495, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974); Williams v. United States, 55 U.S.App.D.C. 239, 4 F.2d 432 (1925). There......
  • U.S. v. Williams, Nos. 83-1642
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • July 12, 1984
    ...See id. at 140-41, 98 S.Ct. at 1724-25; United States v. Quintana, 508 F.2d 867, 874 (7th Cir.1975); United States v. James, 494 F.2d 1007, 1019 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020, 95 S.Ct. 495, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 The defendants do make a distinction between intercepting conversations and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT