United States v. Johnson

Docket Number11-2690
Decision Date24 May 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
74 cases
  • United States v. Parral-Dominguez
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 23, 2015
    ...in conflict with that line of decisions. See United States v. Womack, 732 F.3d 745, 748–49 (7th Cir.2013) ; United States v. Johnson, 680 F.3d 966, 983–84 (7th Cir.2012) ; United States v. Curtis, 645 F.3d 937, 940–43 (7th Cir.2011) ; United States v. Rice, 520 F.3d 811, 820–21 (7th Cir.200......
  • United States v. Bell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • August 28, 2018
    ...would believe an officer’s express questioning [was] reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response." United States v. Johnson , 680 F.3d 966, 976 (7th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted), overruled on other grounds by Fowler v. Butts , 829 F.3d 788 (7th Cir......
  • United States v. Eymann
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • June 12, 2020
    ...ask questions to determine an individual's identity and to obtain information confirming an officer's suspicions." United States v. Johnson , 680 F.3d 966, 974 (7th Cir. 2012), overruled on other grounds by Fowler v. Butts , 829 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2016) ; see Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. ......
  • United States v. D.J.H.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • April 1, 2016
    ...so-called “categorical” approach is a by product of a series of Supreme Court cases interpreting the ACCA. See United States v. Johnson, 680 F.3d 966, 983 (7th Cir.2012) (citing Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137, 141, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008) ). At bottom, this methodology ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • 9.1.3 Self-disqualification
    • United States
    • Criminal Procedure in Practice (ABA) 9 The Trial 9.1 The Judge
    • Invalid date
    ...a material witness in the proceeding.9 --------Notes:[7] . 28 U.S.C. § 455(a); R.C.M. 902(a).[8] . See generally United States v. Johnson, 680 F.3d 966 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Holland, 519 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 2008); Clemmons v. Wolf, 377 F.3d 322 (3rd Cir. 2004); United States v. S......