United States v. Johnson
Decision Date | 18 December 1908 |
Docket Number | 8,700. |
Citation | 181 F. 429 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
H. J Bone, U.S. Atty., and Milton M. Dearing, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty.
Godard & Valentine, for defendant.
This is a bill to vacate the judgment of the district court of Clay county, state of Kansas, rendered on the 6th day of March 1907, adjudging the defendant a naturalized citizen of the United States. The validity of the judgment is assailed on the ground that at the time the defendant filed his petition for naturalization he was a resident of Riley county, Kan and not of Clay county, both counties, however, being in the same judicial district.
The question, therefore, presented for decision in this and other cases similarly situated submitted at this term of court is whether or not under the naturalization act (Act June 29 1906, c. 3592, 34 Stat. 596 (U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 420; Supp. 1909, p. 477)) an alien residing in one county can be naturalized by the decree of a district court sitting in another county of the same judicial district in the state of Kansas. Under Rev. St. U.S. 1878, tit. 30, p. 378, the only requirement was that:
-- from which it will be observed that there was nothing definite as to the venue of the application.
In view of the many abuses and impositions practiced by which undeservers obtained from the various courts certificates of naturalization, and the difficulty of ascertaining on inquiry the domicile of the applicant and his witnesses, the present act was made more specific. It declares:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Vasicek
...in which the court concerned sits (United States v. Schurr (D.C.) 163 F. 648; United States v. Wayer (D.C.) 163 F. 650; United States v. Johnson (D.C.) 181 F. 429; of Briese (D.C.) 267 F. 600 (see In re Pearlman (D.C.) 226 F. 60, for rule when application is filed in federal court)); that h......
-
United States v. Kamm
... ... Wayer (D.C.) 163 F. 650; United ... States v. Van Der Molen (D.C.) 163 F. 650; United ... States v. Nisbet (D.C.) 168 F. 1005; United States ... v. Simon (C.C.) 170 F. 680; United States v. Meyer ... (D.C.) 170 F. 983; United States v. Aakervik ... (D.C.) 180 F. 137; United States v. Johnson ... (C.C.) 181 F. 429; United States v. Plaistow ... (D.C.) 189 F. 1006; United States v. Nopoulos ... (D.C.) 225 F. 656; United States v. Mulvey, 232 ... F. 513, 146 C.C.A. 471; United States v. Nechman ... (D.C.) 183 F. 788. It is unnecessary that exhaustive ... review of these various ... ...
-
United States v. Nopoulos
...v. Schurr (D.C.) 163 F. 648; United States v. Wayer (D.C.) 163 F. 650; United States v. Van Der Molen (D.C.) 163 F. 650; United States v. Johnson (C.C.) 181 F. 429; United States v. Cantini (D.C.) 199 F. Mansour v. United States, 226 U.S. 604, 33 Sup.Ct. 217, 57 L.Ed. 378. In this action th......
-
In re Lennox
...181 F. 428 In re LENNOX et al. Nos. 13,053, 13,157, 13,242.United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.March 26, 1909 ... Brandeis, ... Dunbar & ... ...