+-----------------+
¦TABLE OF CONTENTS¦
+-----------------¦
¦ ¦
+-----------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦I. ¦INTRODUCTION ¦966 ¦
+-----+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+-----+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦II. ¦CONTEXTUAL MATTERS ¦967 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦A. ¦Scope Of The Penalty Retrial ¦968 ¦
+----+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦B. ¦Aggravating Factors ¦971 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦The role of aggravating factors ¦971 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Statutory aggravating factors ¦972 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Factors that can be considered ¦972 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦i. ¦Factors alleged and noticed ¦972 ¦
+----+---+---+---+-----+--------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ii. ¦Factors that can properly be considered ¦973 ¦
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Factors that can be challenged ¦975 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦C. ¦Penalties ¦976 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Penalties vacated ¦976 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Possibility of a death sentence on Count 6 ¦976 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦976 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Controlling authority ¦976 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦c. ¦Analysis ¦978 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦d. ¦Summary ¦979 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦Possibility of a sentence less than life without parole on all Counts ¦979 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦979 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦The statutory sentencing scheme ¦980 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦c. ¦Analysis ¦981 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦i. ¦Johnsons authority ¦981 ¦
+---+---+--+--+------+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ii. ¦The jury's ability to consider lesser penalties ¦981 ¦
+---+---+--+--+------+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦iii. ¦The jury's ability to recommend a lesser penalty ¦983 ¦
+---+---+--+--+------+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦iv. ¦The jury's ability to impose a lesser penalty ¦983 ¦
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦d. ¦Summary ¦985 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦D. ¦Necessity Of A Preliminary Evidentiary Showing ¦985 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦985 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Analysis ¦986 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦III. ¦CHALLENGES TO STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS ¦989 ¦
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦IV. ¦CHALLENGES TO THE NON–STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS ¦990 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦A. ¦Multiple Killings And Passage Of Time ¦990 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Allegations of the factors ¦990 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦990 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦Standards for duplicativeness ¦991 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦4. ¦Analysis ¦993 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦B. ¦Lack of remorse ¦995 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Allegation of the factor ¦995 ¦
+---+---+----+----------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦995 ¦
+---+---+----+----------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦Authority regarding lack of remorse as a separate factor ¦996 ¦
+---+---+----+----------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦4. ¦Analysis ¦999 ¦
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦C. ¦Uncharged Criminal Conduct ¦1000 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Allegations of the factors ¦1000 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Duplicativeness ¦1000 ¦
...