United States v. Johnson
| Court | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina |
| Writing for the Court | THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. |
| Citation | United States v. Johnson, 122 F.Supp.3d 272 (M.D. N.C. 2015) |
| Decision Date | 07 August 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 1:12cv1349.,1:12cv1349. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Terry S. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Alamance County Sheriff, Defendant. |
122 F.Supp.3d 272
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Terry S. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Alamance County Sheriff, Defendant.
No. 1:12cv1349.
United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.
Signed Aug. 7, 2015.
122 F.Supp.3d 280
Michael J. Songer, Anika Gzifa, Jude Volek, Silvia J. Dominguez–Reese, Timothy Mygatt, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
S.C. Kitchen, Karlene S. Turrentine, Turrentine Law Firm, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| I. | FINDINGS OF FACT | 282 |
| A. | Alamance County | 282 |
| 1. | Population and Demographics of Alamance County | 282 |
| 2. | Law Enforcement Challenges in Alamance County | 283 |
| B. | ACSO and Sheriff Johnson | 285 |
| 1. | The Introduction and Implementation of ICE's 287(g) Program in Alamance County | 285 |
| a. | 287(g) Program's TFO | 286 |
| b. | Termination of TFO Position | 289 |
| c. | Gun Permit Investigations | 290 |
| d. | ACSO's Processing and Booking Procedures | 291 |
| e. | Fairness Alamance | 294 |
| 2. | ACSO Arrest Policy and Practice | 295 |
| 3. | Orders to Target Hispanics | 297 |
| 4. | ACSO Checkpoint Policy and Implementation | 298 |
| 5. | ACSO's Stops and Searches | 302 |
| a. | Particular Stops | 302 |
| b. | Statistical Evidence | 304 |
| i. | Dr. John Lamberth | 304 |
| ii. | Dr. John MacDonald | 307 |
| (a) | Post–Stop Outcome Study | 309 |
| (b) | "Hit–Rate" Study | 310 |
| iii. | Officer Mark Dockery and ACSO Data on Searches Not Incident to Arrest | 311 |
| iv. | Dr. David Banks | 312 |
| (a) | ACSO's Checkpoint Siting | 313 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
Nance v. City of Albemarle
... ... 1:19CV641 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. Signed February 16, 2021 520 F.Supp.3d 769 Kirk London ... Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 354 (M.D.N.C. 2015) ; see also Sylvia Dev. Corp. , 48 F.3d at 818–19 ... ...
-
United States v. Brandon Michael Council
... ... " would begin). Finally, the Court notes that information provided by the Federal Judicial Center7 states in unambiguous terms that "[t]he defendant may attempt to prove any mitigating factor and is not required by statute to give notice of mitigating factors." Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty TrialsPage 8 at 54 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/(emphasis added).8II. The Cases Cited by the Government Are Distinguishable The Government cites the ... ...
-
Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Nat'l Gen. Ins. Co.
... ... NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 1:21cv207 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA June 17, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION ... It is not the court's obligation to conduct the parties' research, see United States v. Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 346 (M.D.N.C. 2015), but the court should avoid being led to a potentially ... ...
-
Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
... MR. DEE'S INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. INMAR, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 1:19cv141 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina September 16, 2021 ... 45-micron sized film”); United States v. Johnson, 122 ... F.Supp.3d 272, 330-36 (M.D. N.C. 2015) (excluding proposed ... expert ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
An Empirical Assessment of Pretextual Stops and Racial Profiling.
...agencies for engaging in a pattern or practice of unlawful or unconstitutional conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 331-38 (M.D.N.C. 2015) (describing why the district court ultimately concluded that Dr. John Lamberth's use of an observational study to establis......