United States v. Johnson

CourtU.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
Writing for the CourtTHOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
CitationUnited States v. Johnson, 122 F.Supp.3d 272 (M.D. N.C. 2015)
Decision Date07 August 2015
Docket NumberNo. 1:12cv1349.,1:12cv1349.
Parties UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Terry S. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Alamance County Sheriff, Defendant.

122 F.Supp.3d 272

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Terry S. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Alamance County Sheriff, Defendant.

No. 1:12cv1349.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

Signed Aug. 7, 2015.


122 F.Supp.3d 280

Michael J. Songer, Anika Gzifa, Jude Volek, Silvia J. Dominguez–Reese, Timothy Mygatt, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

S.C. Kitchen, Karlene S. Turrentine, Turrentine Law Firm, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. FINDINGS OF FACT 282
A. Alamance County 282
1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County 282
2. Law Enforcement Challenges in Alamance County 283
B. ACSO and Sheriff Johnson 285
1. The Introduction and Implementation of ICE's 287(g) Program in Alamance County 285
a. 287(g) Program's TFO 286
b. Termination of TFO Position 289
c. Gun Permit Investigations 290
d. ACSO's Processing and Booking Procedures 291
e. Fairness Alamance 294
2. ACSO Arrest Policy and Practice 295
3. Orders to Target Hispanics 297
4. ACSO Checkpoint Policy and Implementation 298
5. ACSO's Stops and Searches 302
a. Particular Stops 302
b. Statistical Evidence 304
i. Dr. John Lamberth 304
ii. Dr. John MacDonald 307
(a) Post–Stop Outcome Study 309
(b) "Hit–Rate" Study 310
iii. Officer Mark Dockery and ACSO Data on Searches Not Incident to Arrest 311
iv. Dr. David Banks 312
(a) ACSO's Checkpoint Siting 313
...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Nance v. City of Albemarle
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • February 16, 2021
    ... ... 1:19CV641 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. Signed February 16, 2021 520 F.Supp.3d 769 Kirk London ... Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 354 (M.D.N.C. 2015) ; see also Sylvia Dev. Corp. , 48 F.3d at 818–19 ... ...
  • United States v. Brandon Michael Council
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • May 2, 2018
    ... ... " would begin).        Finally, the Court notes that information provided by the Federal Judicial Center7 states in unambiguous terms that "[t]he defendant may attempt to prove any mitigating factor and is not required by statute to give notice of mitigating factors." Molly Treadway Johnson & Laural L. Hooper, Federal Judicial Center, Resource Guide for Managing Capital Cases, Volume I: Federal Death Penalty TrialsPage 8 at 54 (April 2004), https://www.fjc.gov/content/(emphasis added).8II. The Cases Cited by the Government Are Distinguishable        The Government cites the ... ...
  • Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Nat'l Gen. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • June 17, 2021
    ... ... NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 1:21cv207 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA June 17, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION ... It is not the court's obligation to conduct the parties' research, see United States v. Johnson , 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 346 (M.D.N.C. 2015), but the court should avoid being led to a potentially ... ...
  • Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • September 16, 2021
    ... MR. DEE'S INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. INMAR, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 1:19cv141 United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina September 16, 2021 ... 45-micron sized film”); United States v. Johnson, 122 ... F.Supp.3d 272, 330-36 (M.D. N.C. 2015) (excluding proposed ... expert ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • An Empirical Assessment of Pretextual Stops and Racial Profiling.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 73 No. 3, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...agencies for engaging in a pattern or practice of unlawful or unconstitutional conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272, 331-38 (M.D.N.C. 2015) (describing why the district court ultimately concluded that Dr. John Lamberth's use of an observational study to establis......