United States v. Johnson, No. CR 01-3046-MWB
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
Writing for the Court | MARK W. BENNETT |
Parties | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANGELA JOHNSON, Defendant. |
Docket Number | No. CR 01-3046-MWB |
Decision Date | 16 January 2013 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
ANGELA JOHNSON, Defendant.
No. CR 01-3046-MWB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Dated: January 16, 2013
I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................5
II. "CONTEXTUAL" MATTERS...........................................................8
A. Scope Of The "Penalty Retrial".................................................9
B. Aggravating Factors..............................................................14
1. The role of aggravating factors........................................14C. Penalties............................................................................23
2. "Statutory aggravating factors".......................................16
a. Factors that can be considered................................16
i. Factors alleged and noticed............................17b. Factors that can be challenged................................22
ii. Factors that can properly be considered.............18
1. Penalties vacated.........................................................23
2. Possibility of a death sentence on Count 6..........................23
a. Arguments of the parties.......................................24
b. Controlling authority............................................24
c. Analysis ............................................................ 26
Page 2
D. Necessity Of A Preliminary Evidentiary Showing..........................40d. Summary...........................................................293. Possibility of a sentence less than life without parole on all Counts ...................................................................... 29
a. Arguments of the parties.......................................30
b. The statutory sentencing scheme..............................31
c. Analysis ............................................................ 32
i. Johnson's authority.....................................32d. Summary...........................................................40
ii. The jury's ability to consider lesser penalties......33
iii. The jury's ability to recommend a lesser penalty ..................................................... 36
iv. The jury's ability to impose a lesser penalty........37
1. Arguments of the parties................................................41
2. Analysis .................................................................... 41
III. CHALLENGES TO STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS................48
IV. CHALLENGES TO THE NON-STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS .................................................................................. 50
A. "Multiple Killings" And "Passage Of Time"...............................50...
1. Allegations of the factors ...............................................50B. "Lack of remorse"...............................................................58
2. Arguments of the parties................................................50
3. Standards for "duplicativeness" .......................................51
4. Analysis .................................................................... 55
1. Allegation of the factor.................................................. 58C. "Uncharged Criminal Conduct"............................................... 67
2. Arguments of the parties................................................ 59
3. Authority regarding "lack of remorse" as a separate factor ..... 60
4. Analysis .................................................................... 65
1. Allegations of the factors ............................................... 67
2. Duplicativeness ........................................................... 69
3. Inadmissibility in general ............................................... 71
a. Statutory and other limitations ................................ 71
i. Arguments of the parties ............................... 71
ii. The purported statutory bar............................ 72
iii. Admissibility of
To continue reading
Request your trial