United States v. Jones
| Docket Number | 16-4254 |
| Decision Date | 28 June 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
United States v. Parkins
...object to a warrantless search to which his co-tenant consents—the district court looked to out-of-circuit precedent, United States v. Jones, 861 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2017), and concluded that a defendant can validly object to a search of his residence only if he is "standing at the door and ......
-
Hamdan v. United States
...of that search and Yahia's cooperation, there was probable cause to obtain a warrant for the second unit. See United States v. Jones, 861 F.3d 638, 643-44 (7th Cir. 2017) (applying inevitable discovery to warrantless search where the government "had legal justification for a warrant").5 Ham......
-
United States v. Christensen
...from the apartment constituted "removal," Defendant would have to show that the removal was not objectively reasonable. See United States v. Jones, 861 F.3d 638, 642. Here, the agents were seeking his assistance in executing the warrant to search Defendant's car, and they had a valid intere......
-
United States v. Pouncey
...that the officers 'ultimately or inevitably' would have discovered the challenged evidence by lawful means." United States v. Jones, 861 F.3d 638, 643 (7th Cir. 2017) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 (1984)). To meet this burden, "the government must show(1) that it had, or would......
Get Started for Free