United States v. Junger

Docket Number12-1006,12-1100
Decision Date07 January 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
54 cases
  • United States v. Bruguier
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 5 d2 Novembro d2 2013
    ...most recently in Maracich v. Spears, 570 U.S. ––––, ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2191, 2203, 186 L.Ed.2d 275 (2013) and United States v. Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066, 1069–70 (8th Cir.2013)). “No more than isolated words or sentences is punctuation alone a reliable guide for discovery of a statute's meaning.”......
  • Iverson v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 31 d1 Agosto d1 2020
    ...a word is not defined by statute, we normally construe it in accord with its ordinary or natural meaning." United States v. Jungers , 702 F.3d 1066, 1071 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting Smith v. United States , 508 U.S. 223, 228, 113 S.Ct. 2050, 124 L.Ed.2d 138 (1993) ). We have stated that "[o]rd......
  • Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 12 d4 Dezembro d4 2013
    ...United States v. Fernandez, 710 F.3d 847, 849 (8th Cir.2013) (reviewing “constitutional challenges de novo”); United States v. Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066, 1069 (8th Cir.2013) (reviewing de novo a question of statutory interpretation); Clark v. USDA, 537 F.3d 934, 939 (8th Cir.2008) (reviewing d......
  • In re Trusts Established Under the Pooling & Servicing Agreements Relating to the Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortg. Trust Commercial Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007–C30, Civil No. 16–2487 (DWF/KMM)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • 14 d2 Março d2 2017
    ...the plain language unless it would "produce a result demonstrably at odds with the intentions of its drafters." United States v. Jungers , 702 F.3d 1066, 1069 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting Contemp. Indus. Corp. v. Frost , 564 F.3d 981, 985 (8th Cir. 2009) ). The court should not simply consider ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • BEYOND THE CAGES: SEX TRAFFICKING IN SOUTH DAKOTA.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Law Review Vol. 64 No. 3, September 2019
    • 22 d0 Setembro d0 2019
    ...Id. at 7. (130.) Id. (131.) E.g., United States v. Bonestroo, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 981 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012); United States v. Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066 (2013); Payer v. United States, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22698 (D.S.D. Feb. 20, 2013); Campbell v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134085 ......
1 provisions
  • PL 114-22, S 178 – Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015
    • United States
    • US session laws and acts U.S. Public Laws
    • 1 d4 Janeiro d4 2015
    ...to encompass those who purchase illicit sexual acts from trafficking victims, some confusion persists; (3) in United States vs. Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066 (8th Cir. 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, applied ......