United States v. Keefe

Decision Date01 December 1870
Citation11 Wall. 178,78 U.S. 178,20 L.Ed. 131
PartiesUNITED STATES v. O'KEEFE
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Court of Claims; the case being thus:

By act of Congress of 1855,* establishing the Court of Claims, persons are authorized to sue the United States. The words of the enactment are:

'And the said court SHALL hear and determine all claims founded upon any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an executive department, or upon any contract, express or implied, with the government of the United States, which may be suggested to it by a petition filed therein.'- When the court gives judgment for the claimant, the judgment is paid by the Secretary of the Treasury as of course, unless within a time specified the United States appeal to this court; Congress making always, in the annual appropriation bill, an appropriation for judgments in the Court of Claims.

By the terms of a later act (that of July 27, 1868),** the right to recover from the United States, by process in the said court, the proceeds of captured and abandoned property, is confined to 'citizens or subjects of any government which accords to citizens of the United States the right to prosecute claims against such government in its courts.'

With these statutes in force, one O'Keefe, a subject of Great Britain, brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover from the United States the proceeds of certain captured and abandoned cotton. The question was, conceding his right otherwise to recover, whether Great Britain gave our citizens the right to prosecute claims against her, in her courts.

The Court of Claims found as a fact,

'That the government of England accords to its subjects and aliens the right to prosecute claims against it by petition of right given by the common law of England, and regulated by statute 23d and 24th Victoria, July 3, 1860, as to the mode of procedure; in which the petition addressed to the King is, by his fiat indorsed thereon, directed to a court of his kingdom, to hear and determine the case. The fiat, except in a very extraordinary case, is granted as a matter of right to any suppliant, subject or alien. The petition is in form addressed to the grace and favor of the King, but in practice is left at the office of the Home Secretary, and the fiat is then obtained as a matter of official routine.'

By the act of 23d and 24th Victoria, thus referred to in the above finding, and so made part of it, it is enacted that:

'§ 2. The said petition shall be left with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in order that the same may be submitted to her Majesty for her Majesty's gracious consideration, and in order that her Majesty, if she shall think fit, may grant her fiat that right be done, and no fee or sum of money shall be payable by the suppliant on so leaving such petition, or upon his receiving back the same.

'§ 3. Upon her Majesty's fiat being obtained to such petition, a copy of such petition and fiat shall be left at the office of the solicitor to the treasury, with an indorsement thereon in the form or to the effect in the schedule [No. 2] to this act annexed, praying for a plea or answer on behalf of her Majesty within twenty-eight days.'

The solicitor mentioned in the last section is to transmit the petition to the department of the government having charge of the subject to which it relates; and proceedings are there to be taken to have the thing judicially heard. In case of failure on behalf of her Majesty, or other person called upon to plead, answer, or demur, in due him, either to such petition, or at any subsequent stage of the proceedings thereon, the suppliant shall be at liberty to apply to the court or a judge for an order, that the petition be taken pro confesso; which, on proofs, &c., it may be. After judgment, it is made lawful for the commissioners of her Majesty's treasury, and they are required, to pay the amount of any moneys and costs as to which a judgment shall be given, &c., out of any moneys in their hands for the time being applicable thereto, or which may be thereafter voted by Parliament for that purpose, provided such petition shall relate to any public matter; and in case the same shall relate to any matter affecting her Majesty in her private capacity, the amount to which the suppliant is entitled shall be paid to him out of such funds or moneys as her Majesty shall be graciously pleased to direct to be applied for that purpose.

The 15th section of the act enacts that the judges of the courts of law, or three or more of the judges of the Court of Chancery, &c., shall make all such general rules and orders in their said respective courts of law and equity for regulating the pleading and practice on such petitions of right, and for the effectual execution of the act, and of its intention and object, as they may think fit, necessary, reasonable, or proper, and frame writs and forms of proceeding; 'provided always,' however, the statute goes on to say,- 'That it shall be lawful for the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by any proclamation inserted in the London Gazette, or for either of the houses of Parliament, by any resolution passed at any time within three months next after such rules, orders, and regulations shall have been laid before Parliament, to suspend the whole or any part of such rules, orders, or regulations, and in such case the whole, or such part thereof as shall be so suspended, shall not be binding and obligatory on the said courts.'

The Court of Claims, considering that this act of the British government did 'accord to citizens of the United States the right to prosecute claims against such government in its courts,' and considering further, that on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • McElroy v. Swart
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • September 29, 1885
    ... ... 484, 488; The ... Siren, 7 Wall. 152, 154; The Davis, 10 Wall. 15, 20; U.S. v ... O'Keefe, 11 Wall. 178; Case v. Terrell, 11 Wall. 199, ... 201; Carr v. U.S. 98 U.S. 433, 437; U.S. v ... Antoni v. Greenhow, 2 S.Ct. 103, per MATTHEWS, J ... 4. SUITS AGAINST THE SEVERAL STATES--ELEVENTH ... AMENDMENT TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. In our system of ... jurisprudence these ... ...
  • National City Bank of New York v. Republic of China
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1955
    ...§ 2502, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2502. The earliest version of this statute appears in 15 Stat. 243, Act of July 27, 1868; see United States v. O'Keefe, 11 Wall. 178, 20 L.Ed. 131; cf. 43 Stat. 1113, 46 U.S.C. § 785, 46 U.S.C.A. § 785; Westfal-Larsen & Co. v. United States, D.C.N.D.Cal., 41 F.2d 550. ......
  • Moon v. Hines
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • January 20, 1921
    ... ... Hines, as Director ... General of Railroads of the United States, successor in ... office to William G. McAdoo ... The ... pleas were of the ... 607] ... etc., Co., 18 How. 272, 15 L.Ed. 372; Beers v. Arkansas, ... supra; U.S. v. O'Keefe, 11 Wall. 178, 20 L.Ed ... 131; Finn v. U.S., 123 U.S. 227, 8 Sup.Ct. 82, 31 ... L.Ed. 128; ... ...
  • United States v. Lee Kaufman v. Same
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1882
    ...ceremonious, it is, nevertheless, a practical and efficient remedy for the invasion by the sovereign power of individual rights.' U.S. v. O'Keefe, 11 Wall. 178. There is in this country, however, no such thing as the petition of right, as there is no such thing as a kingly head to the natio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT