United States v. Kennedy, CV 76-1708-AAH.

Decision Date18 May 1977
Docket NumberNo. CV 76-1708-AAH.,CV 76-1708-AAH.
Citation431 F. Supp. 877
CourtU.S. District Court — Central District of California
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff. v. Nancy B. KENNEDY, an Individual and Nancy B. Kennedy d/b/a Doby Realty Company, Defendants. Nancy B. KENNEDY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. John E. McREYNOLDS, Third-Party Defendant.

William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civ. Div. by Peter H. Kane, Asst. U.S. Atty., for United States.

George Whitaker, Los Angeles, Cal., for third-party plaintiffs, Nancy B. Kennedy, individually, and Nancy B. Kennedy d/b/a Doby Realty Co.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HAUK, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. On or about October 18, 1976 defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Nancy B. Kennedy, individually, and Nancy B. Kennedy d/b/a Doby Realty Company, filed a Third Party Complaint in the above action naming John E. McReynolds as the third-party defendant therein.

2. The allegations of each cause of action of the Third Party Complaint set forth that the third-party defendant made false and fraudulent representations to the third-party plaintiffs, to wit, that he intended to move into and occupy certain real property located at 1319-1319½ West 68th Street, Los Angeles, California when, in fact, he never intended to do so. Furthermore, according to said allegations, if she were liable to the plaintiff under the False Claims Act ("Act") for having made or caused to be made these false representations to the Government, she would be entitled to indemnification from the third-party defendant.

3. The third cause of action of said Third Party Complaint seeks damages which comprehend defendants' and third-party plaintiffs' costs, including attorney's fees, incurred by their necessity to defend this lawsuit.

4. Title 31, United States Code, Section 231 states in part:

"Any person . . . who shall make or cause to be made, or present or cause to be presented, for payment or approval, to or by any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval services of the United States, any claim upon or against the Government of the United States or any department or officer thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, or who, for the purpose of obtaining or aiding to obtain the payment or approval of such claim, makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, any false bill, receipt, voucher, roll, account, claim, certificate, affidavit, or deposition, knowing the same to contain any fraudulent or fictitious statement or entry . . . shall forfeit and pay to the United States the sum of $2,000, and, in addition, double the amount of damages which the United States may have sustained by reason of the doing or committing such act, together
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • US v. Hercules, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Utah
    • May 24, 1996
    ...so state or consider the matter in depth. See also Alsco-Harvard Fraud Litigation, 523 F.Supp. 790 (D.D.C. 1981); United States v. Kennedy, 431 F.Supp. 877 (C.D.Cal.1977) (knew the claim was In United States v. Ehrlich, 643 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1981) the court upheld FCA sanctions observing "E......
  • In re Xerox Corp.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 22, 2018
    ...996, 999 (M.D. Pa. 1990) ; United States v. Hero , No. 78 Civ. 4587(WCC), 1981 WL 1982, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) ; United States v. Kennedy , 431 F.Supp. 877, 878 (C.D. Cal. 1977) ; United States ex rel. Rodriquez v. Weekly Publ'ns, Inc. , 74 F.Supp. 763, 769-70 (S.D.N.Y. 1947) ; cf. Tex. Indu......
  • United States v. Omnicare, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • July 23, 2013
    ...Inc., 895 F. Supp. 294, 296 (S.D. Ala. 1995); United States v. Nardone, 782 F. Supp. 996, 999 (M.D. Pa. 1990); United States v. Kennedy, 431 F. Supp. 877 (C.D. Cal. 1977)); see also United States ex rel. Vainer v. DaVita, Inc., No. 1:07-CV-2509-CAP, 2013 WL 1342431, at *4 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 13,......
  • U.S. ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert Intern. Const.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • August 3, 2007
    ...Tech., Inc., 895 F.Supp. 294, 296 (S.D.Ala.1995); United States v. Nardone, 782 F.Supp. 996, 999 (M.D.Pa.1990); United States v. Kennedy, 431 F.Supp. 877 (C.D.Cal.1977). These courts have been alert to the likelihood that clever defendants will seek what federal law denies them under the gu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Indemnity Rights Under The False Claims Act: Fact Or Illusion
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 20, 2012
    ...from his own negligence). 3 Mortgages, Inc. v. United States, 934 F.2d 209 (9th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Kennedy, 431 F. Supp. 877 (C.D. Cal. 4 Mortgages, Inc., 934 F.2d at 213. 5 Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc., 586 F.3d 1204, 1209 (9th Cir. 2010). 6 Id. 7 Even cou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT