United States v. Kieffer
| Docket Number | 10-1391 |
| Decision Date | 11 June 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
87 cases
-
United States v. Sterling Islands, Inc.
...part of Defendant's ongoing scheme ... and (2) constituted a criminal offense under a federal or state statute." United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1168 (10th Cir. 2012). Next, the United States must "prove the amount of loss (or a reasonable estimate thereof) associated with that con......
-
United States v. MacKay
...application, we review the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, in a light most favorable to the Government. United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1152 (10th Cir.2012). The evidence need not “convince a trier of fact beyond all doubt,” rather, the evidence “need only reasonably supp......
-
United States v. Gonzales
...part of Defendant's ongoing scheme ... and (2) constituted a criminal offense under a federal or state statute.” United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1168 (10th Cir.2012). Next, the United States must “prove the amount of loss (or a reasonable estimate thereof) associated with that cond......
-
United States v. Lewis
...calculate a sentence under the Guidelines, and it is error to calculate the sentence incorrectly, see United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1164-65 (10th Cir. 2012). Only a properly calculated Guidelines sentence is presumed reasonable. See United States v. Reyes-Alfonso, 653 F.3d 1137, ......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...381 (5th Cir. 2012), §§7:07, 12:01 United States v. Kennedy , 643 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir. 2011), §§16:06, 16:12 United States v. Kieffer , 681 F.3d 1143 (10th Cir. 2012), §§4:45, 6:16, 6:24, 12:03 United States v. Kimsey , 668 F.3d 691 (9th Cir. 2012), §§3:27, 10:08, 12:02 United States v. Koja......
-
MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD
...power’ under the Commerce Clause” (quoting United States v. Hook, 195 F.3d 299, 310 (7th Cir. 1999))). 12. See United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1154–55 (10th Cir. 2012) (“[O]ne individual’s use of the internet, ‘standing alone,’ does not establish an interstate transmission.” Howeve......
-
Mail and Wire Fraud
...725 F.3d 954, 968 (9th Cir. 2013) (noting that wires are instrumentalities of interstate commerce). 14. See United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1154–55 (10th Cir. 2012) (“The presence of end users in different states, coupled with the very character of the internet, render this inferen......
-
Mail and Wire Fraud
...power’ under the Commerce Clause” (quoting United States v. Hook, 195 F.3d 299, 310 (7th Cir. 1999))). 14. See United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143, 1154–55 (10th Cir. 2012) (“[O]ne individual’s use of the internet, ‘standing alone,’ does not establish an interstate transmission.” Howeve......
Get Started for Free