United States v. King

• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
• Writing for the Court: KOZINSKI
• Citation: United States v. King, 682 F.3d 779, 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5745, 2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6952 (9th Cir. 2012)
• Decision Date: 24 May 2012
• Docket Number: No. 11–10182.,11–10182.
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Marcel Daron KING, Defendant–Appellant.

682 F.3d 779

12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5745

2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6952

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.Marcel Daron KING, Defendant–Appellant.

No. 11–10182.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 24, 2012.

Melinda Haag, U.S. Attorney, Suzanne Miles, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Barbara Valliere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee.

Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Daniel Blank, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.

D.C. No. 3:10–cr–00455–WHA–1.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge NGUYEN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.