United States v. Kismetoglu, 72-1413.
Decision Date | 05 March 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 72-1413.,72-1413. |
Citation | 468 F.2d 1386 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Agop KISMETOGLU, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Larry L. Dier, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert N. Harris, Jr. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before BROWNING and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge.*
The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court may, in a criminal proceeding, enjoin the United States from filing a forfeiture action for alleged violation of the customs laws.
We hold this court's opinion in United States v. One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971) requires that this question be answered in the affirmative.
Judgment affirmed.
* Honorable Raymond E. Plummer, United States District Judge, District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Standlee v. Rhay
... ... B. J. RHAY, Respondent-Appellant ... No. 76-1297 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... Ninth Circuit ... July 21, 1977 ... But in United States v. Kismetoglu, 476 F.2d 269 (9 Cir.), modifying 468 F.2d 1386 (9 Cir.), cert. dism'd, ... ...
-
United States v. Kismetoglu, 72-1413.
...One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971), a per curiam opinion was filed on October 30, 1972, in United States v. Kismetoglu, 468 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1972), affirming the judgment of the district court in United States v. Kismetoglu, 350 F.Supp. 333 (C.D.Cal.1971). In doing......