United States v. Kopp, 75-1536

Decision Date06 December 1976
Docket NumberNo. 75-1536,75-1536
Citation429 U.S. 121,97 S.Ct. 400,50 L.Ed.2d 336
PartiesUNITED STATES v. John David KOPP
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The operative facts herein are substantially identical to those in United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 24, 50 L.Ed.2d 1, and United States v. Rose, 429 U.S. 5, 97 S.Ct. 26, 50 L.Ed.2d 5. Respondent's car was stopped by Border Patrol agents; a search disclosed marihuana. Respondent lost a motion to suppress and was found guilty after a bench trial. Following this trial, but before sentencing, the District Court, relying upon our decision in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973), dismissed the indictment. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, as it did in Morrison and Rose, found the Government's appeal barred by double jeopardy.

In United States v. Wilson, 420 U.S. 332, 95 S.Ct. 1013, 43 L.Ed.2d 232 (1975), we held that double jeopardy would not bar a Government appeal if success on that appeal would result in the reinstatement of a verdict of guilty. The fact that the dismissal of the indictment here occurred after a general finding of guilt rendered by the court in a bench trial, rather than after a return of a verdict of guilty by a jury, is immaterial. Morrison, supra. Double jeopardy therefore does not bar an appeal by the Government.

We grant the petition for certiorari, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand to that court for proceedings consistent herewith.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Hyman v. Aiken, Civ. A. No. 84-1763-1J.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • March 31, 1985
    ... ... Civ. A. No. 84-1763-1J ... United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division ... March ... ...
  • United States v. Scott
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 14, 1978
    ...Court, but merely a reinstatement of the finding of guilt." Id., at ----, 98 S.Ct., at 1057. Accord, United States v. Kopp, 429 U.S. 121, 97 S.Ct. 400, 50 L.Ed.2d 336 (1976); United States v. Rose, 429 U.S. 5, 97 S.Ct. 26, 50 L.Ed.2d 5 (1976); United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct.......
  • O'Bryan v. Estelle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 26, 1983
    ... ... Corrections, Respondent- Appellee ... No. 82-2422 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... Fifth Circuit ... Aug. 26, 1983 ... ...
  • Russell v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • August 12, 1992
    ... ... , feeling bound by prior decisions of this Court as well as the United States Supreme Court, we vacate the sentence of death and remand for ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Pronouncements of the United States Supreme Court in the Criminal Law Field: 1976-1977 Term
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 6-9, September 1977
    • Invalid date
    ...S.Ct. 24, 50 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976); United States v. Rose, ___ U.S. ___, 97 S.Ct. 26, 50 L.Ed.2d 5 (1976); United States v. Kopp, ___ U.S. ___, 97 S.Ct. 400, 50 L.Ed.2d 336 (1976). In this series of per curiam opinions, a unanimous Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a Govern......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT