United States v. Legg
Decision Date | 08 January 1901 |
Docket Number | 55. |
Citation | 105 F. 930 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. LEGG. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Henry C. Platt, for the United States.
Everit Brown, for appellee.
Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
The only question presented is whether the importation is subject to the duty imposed by the tariff act of 1894, or to that imposed by the tariff act of 1897. The latter act provided that (except where otherwise specified) the new rates of duty should be levied, collected, and paid 'on and after the passage of this act. ' Its final section (34), providing for the repeal of inconsistent legislation, contained the usual provision that the same shall not affect any act done or any right accruing or accrued. The thirty-third section reads as follows, being in the form usual in such acts:
etc.
Manifestly that part of the section beginning, 'and all goods,' etc., 'previously entered,' deals only with goods entered for warehouse, and need not further be considered, since the importation at bar was entered for consumption. The facts, about which there is no dispute, are as follows: It is conceded that by the president's signature the new tariff act did not take effect until 4:06 p.m. on Saturday, July 24, 1897. The official and actual business hours of the custom house ended at 4 p.m. of that day. The goods in question were on the steamship La Touraine. She arrived in the port of New York prior to 11:50 a.m. July 24th, and, in accordance with the usual practice, her arrival was at that hour posted in the custom house. Thus advised of the arrival of his goods, the importer, before 4 p.m. on that day, presented himself at the proper place, with all the necessary papers, and with the money to pay the duties, and offered to make a consumption entry for the merchandise and pay duties. The entry was refused by the collector on the ground that the vessel had not made entry in accordance with the law and regulations. On the following Monday the merchandise was entered for consumption, and duties were assessed thereon under the new act.
Section 2774, Rev. St. U.S., provides that within 24 hours after the arrival of any vessel from a foreign port the master shall repair to the office of the chief officer of customs and make report of the arrival, and shall thereupon or thereafter file a manifest, etc. This court has held that section 33, above quoted, does not, by the use of the word 'entry,' refer to this 'entry of the vessel.' In re Gardiner, 4 C.C.A. 155, 53 F. 1013. Section 2785, Rev. St. U.S., reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Heike v. United States
...of the original entries on basis of the false weights and a refund of the consequent difference in duties. This court, in U.S. v. Legg, 105 F. 930, 45 C.C.A. 134, pointed out 'The term 'entry' in the acts of Congress is used in two senses. In many of the acts it refers to the bill of entry,......
-
Titanium Metals Corp. v. US, Slip Op. 95-153. Court No. 94-04-00236.
...but a transaction, — a series of acts which are necessary to ... the entering of the goods." Id. at 59 (quoting United States v. Legg, 105 F. 930, 933 (2d Cir.1901)). The court stated that "Congress intended to connote by the phrase `entered for consumption' a series of acts which are neces......
-
United States v. Edwin S. Hartwell Lumber Co.
...at the time has the legal right to cancel his obligation and his adversary is under the legal duty to accept performance. In U.S. v. Legg, 105 F. 930, 45 C.C.A. 134, it decided that, after an importation of goods was complete, a tender of entry before the Dingley act went into force was equ......
-
Cassel v. United States
... ... original liquidation of the duty. This view, apparently, ... finds supports in the following cases: United States v ... Frazer, 10 Ben. 347, Fed. Cas. No. 15,161; United ... States v. Seidenberg (C.C.) 17 F. 227; United States ... v. Legg, 105 F. 930, 45 C.C.A. 134; Mosle v. Bidwell ... (C.C.) 119 F. 480; United States v. Leng (D.C.) ... 18 F. 15; Beard v. Porter, 124 U.S. 437, 8 Sup.Ct ... 556, 31 L.Ed. 492; Gandolfi v. United States, 74 F ... 549, 20 C.C.A. 652. These adjudications firmly settle the ... point under ... ...