United States v. Long, 82-1504.

Decision Date18 April 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1504.,82-1504.
Citation705 F.2d 1259
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luther Ben LONG, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Charles H. Froeb, Tulsa, Okl., for defendant-appellant.

Gerald Hilsher, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tulsa, Okl. (Frank Keating, U.S. Atty. and Philard L. Rounds, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before McKAY, BREITENSTEIN, and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Luther Ben Long appeals his conviction by a jury on nine counts of possession of stolen mail, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred (1) in not suppressing evidence obtained from a car Long was driving because the stop and search of the car allegedly violated Long's Fourth Amendment rights; (2) in not severing Long's trial from that of a codefendant; and (3) in not granting Long's motion for acquittal on the ground that the government did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Long possessed the mail in question.

Over approximately a three month period Postal Inspector C.E. Welch investigated an unusually high number of thefts of mail from curbside rural mailboxes in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area. He learned that the mail was stolen in order to carry out a "split deposit" scheme that works as follows. The thief takes outgoing mail from a private mailbox — often curbside mailboxes because they are far from the house and can be rifled from a car. The thief hopes to obtain envelopes containing checks mailed in payment for services or credit accounts. The householder's check, although made out to a third party, contains the householder's name and address, the name of the bank on which the check is drawn, and the householder's account number in that bank. The thief has his own set of worthless checks. He makes out one of these checks to the householder. He then goes to the householder's bank, fills out a deposit slip in the householder's name and account number, and, posing as the householder, deposits the worthless check less a certain amount of cash. The householder's name and account number match the bank's records, so the bank hands the thief the cash and deposits the fictitious remainder to the householder's account.

As Welch's investigation progressed, he developed a list of people and cars he believed were involved in the mail thefts and split deposits. One of the people was Debora Adkins, Luther Ben Long's wife or girlfriend, and one of the cars was a blue and white Chevrolet Debora Adkins owned. On the morning of December 14, 1981, Welch was watching Adkins' house and saw parked there a black Thunderbird with Oklahoma license number ZZH-1254. He had not encountered the Thunderbird before, so he ran a registration check on it; the check showed the owner to be Michael McNatt. Welch abandoned his surveillance at 9:00 a.m. without having observed any activity at the house or involving the car. Later that day Welch received reports that mail had been stolen from several curbside mailboxes in Owasso, Oklahoma. Only one box had contained outgoing checks. Welch spoke with the owner of that mailbox and learned that her checking account was at the First Bank of Owasso. He then notified the bank of the possibility of a split deposit attempt. After contacting the bank, Welch spoke with the Owasso Police Department dispatcher. He described the split deposit scheme to the dispatcher, saying that he anticipated a split deposit attempt at the First Bank of Owasso. He gave the dispatcher descriptions of four vehicles; one was the black Thunderbird he had seen that morning, which he described by make, color, year, and license number. Welch requested the Owasso police to stop any of the vehicles if the bank reported an attempt to execute the split deposit scheme.

The dispatcher called Officer Clifford Motto to the station and relayed to him the information received from Welch. The record does not disclose exactly what the dispatcher told Motto. However, Motto testified that he received a note from the dispatcher containing the list of cars, the information that the cars were connected with a mail theft ring, and the instruction that if the bank reported a split deposit attempt any of the cars seen should be detained.

After receiving this information, Motto returned to his car and resumed patrolling. He drove by the bank, which was near the police station. The bank had not reported a split deposit attempt, but as Motto passed the bank he saw the black Thunderbird pull out of the bank's parking lot onto the street. Motto checked the Thunderbird's license number against his list and verified that it was the car described by Inspector Welch. Motto radioed for a backup unit, followed the car for about twelve blocks, and pulled it over. Motto had not observed any traffic violations by the driver of the car.

After stopping the Thunderbird, the driver, who was defendant Long, got out and walked toward Motto's patrol car. Motto got out of his car, and the two men stopped somewhere between the cars to talk. At this point the backup officer, Chief Edmond Reyes of the Owasso Police Department, arrived on the scene. Officer Motto asked Long for his driver's license. When Long could not produce one, Motto and Reyes placed him under arrest. Reyes then approached the parked Thunderbird to question its occupants. There were three people in the car: Debora Adkins in the front seat, Quinion Ray Leigh in the back seat, and another woman, who was not indicted, also in the back seat. Reyes asked Adkins to identify herself. She reached for a purse that was sitting next to her on the seat to retrieve a driver's license. Reyes testified that he observed the purse in plain view and that the purse was so stuffed with checks and mail it could not be closed. He testified that from his vantage point outside the car he could readily identify the protruding material as checks and mail. Officer Motto, who shortly thereafter approached the car, also testified to seeing the purse, checks, and mail in plain view on the front seat. At this point Reyes confiscated the purse and its contents, removed the items to his patrol car, and placed the three remaining occupants of the Thunderbird under arrest.

None of the arrestees could produce evidence of ownership of the car.1 Therefore, when the four were taken to jail the police had the car towed and impounded. Prior to the impoundment, a third Owasso policeman performed a routine inventory of the car's condition and contents. During this inventory the officer opened the Thunderbird's trunk and discovered a bag that he testified was overflowing with mail and checks. He took the bag and its contents to the police station.

Luther Ben Long, Quinion Ray Leigh, and Debora Adkins were each charged with nine counts of possession of stolen mail. Leigh and Long were tried together. At the trial, checks recovered from both the purse and the trunk were introduced. A fingerprint expert testified that Long's prints were on mail found in the trunk and the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • U.S. v. Espinosa, s. 83-2001
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • August 26, 1985
    ...is not granted as a matter of right, but only when the defendant would be prejudiced by a joint trial." United States v. Long, 705 F.2d 1259, 1262 (10th Cir.1983). To establish that a trial court abused its discretion in denying severance, a defendant must show that "actual prejudice" resul......
  • U.S. v. Beltran-Palafox
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • June 3, 2010
    ...enforcement officers may impound an automobile until the ownership of the vehicle can be ascertained." Id. (citing United States v. Long, 705 F.2d 1259, 1262 (10th Cir.1983)). 144 Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367, 107 S.Ct. 738, 93 L.Ed.2d 739 (1987); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364......
  • Hill v. United States
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • July 3, 1986
    ...v. Laing 708 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983); United States v. Long 705 F.2d 1259 (10th Cir. 1983); United States v. Bosby, 675 F.2d 1174, 1179-81 (11th Cir. 1982); Edwards, 577 F.2d at 894; United States v. Martin, 566 F.......
  • U.S. v. Hack, s. 85-1068
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • January 23, 1986
    ...its discretion, a defendant must show actual prejudice to him resulting from a denial of his request for severance. United States v. Long, 705 F.2d 1259, 1262 (10th Cir.1983). Neither a mere allegation that defendant would have a better chance of acquittal in a separate trial, United States......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT