United States v. Lowery, Crim. No. 1105-65.

Decision Date24 May 1966
Docket NumberCrim. No. 1105-65.
Citation261 F. Supp. 396
PartiesUNITED STATES of America v. Mary LOWERY.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Columbia

Application of George C. Dreos, Esquire for Compensation under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)

BAZELON, Chief Circuit Judge.

The payment of compensation in the total amount of $902.50 which has been approved by the District Court is disapproved to the extent that it exceeds $500.

The trial lasted from April 1, 1966, to April 6, 1966. The trial judge approved this allowance at the maximum amount of $15 per hour, for 27 hours spent in court, and at a maximum of $10 per hour for 44 hours spent out of court.

I cannot approve the allowance on this application of any amount beyond the limit of $500 set by the Congress for the remuneration of counsel as I do not believe that the extent and nature of the services rendered can be said to constitute "protracted representation" or "extraordinary circumstances." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d). At the same time I do not doubt that the services rendered to the client are fairly worth the total of $902.50. While success in the ultimate outcome of the case is an important factor, it cannot be the governing consideration.

It seems clear, however, from the language of the statute and its legislative history that the Congress did not intend that the $500 limit was to apply in every case where the number of hours computed at the maximum rates permitted would give a total exceeding the sum of $500. The statute which reads as follows:

"In
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • United States v. James
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • March 26, 1969
    ...United States v. Thomas, 261 F.Supp. 431 (D.D. C.1966); United States v. Stith, 261 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C.1966); United States v. Lowery, 261 F.Supp. 396 (D.D.C. 1966); United States v. Moore, 258 F. Supp. 790 (D.D.C.1966); United States v. Owens, 256 F.Supp. 861 (W.D.Pa. 1966); United States......
  • United States v. Carnevale
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • December 19, 1985
    ...profession," Hildebrandt, 420 F.Supp. at 477, courts cannot give carte blanche to C.J.A. fee applications. See also United States v. Lowery, 261 F.Supp. 396, 397 (D.D.C.1966) (decided under the Act prior to the 1970 Considering all of the criteria mentioned above, see text ante at Part III,......
  • United States v. Thompson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • July 31, 1973
    ...upon a finding of "protracted representation." E.g., United States v. Harper, 311 F.Supp. 1072 (D. D.C.1970), United States v. Lowery, 261 F.Supp. 396 (D.D.C.1966). The amended statute substitutes "extended or complex representation" as the relevant criteria for excess compensation. The leg......
  • Oscar Gruss & Son v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 28, 1966
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT