United States v. Madrid
Decision Date | 11 March 2019 |
Docket Number | No. CR 18-0836 JB,CR 18-0836 JB |
Parties | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. YVONNE MADRID, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico |
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Objection to the Presentece [sic] Report and Sentencing Memorandum, filed September 11, 2018 (Doc. 62)("Objections"). The Court held a sentencing hearing on September 20, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should consider, as evidence relevant to determining the weight of the Suboxone1 smuggled into prison, testimony from a Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") agent regarding the quantity of controlled substances that Defendant Yvonne Madrid allegedly attempted to supplyin units and how much money would be made from said quantity should be considered; (ii) whether the Court should consider, as evidence that Madrid should receive a mitigating role adjustment pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2(b) (U.S. Sentencing Comm'n 2016)("U.S.S.G."), letters from co-Defendant Christopher Chavez, Madrid's ex-husband and the intended recipient of the Suboxone that she attempted to supply pressuring Madrid to send him Suboxone in jail, instructing her on how to do it, and threatening her and her boyfriend at the time;2 (iii) whether, in the interests of justice, the Court should vary Madrid's sentence downward to eliminate the disparity between her base offense level of 26, and her co-Defendant Chavez' base offense level of 13, when the Presentence Investigation Report, filed August 22, 2018 (Doc. 57)("PSR"), acknowledges that Madrid and Chavez were charged with the same conspiracy to distribute, see PSR ¶ 1, at 3, and that Chavez instructed Madrid on how to commit the offense, see PSR ¶¶ 6-9, at 3-4; (iv) whether, considering United States v. Cani, 545 F. Supp. 2d 1235(M.D. Fl. 2008)(Conway, J.), the Court should compare the advisory Guidelines sentence the PSR recommends -- 70 to 87 month -- with the sentencing range to which Madrid would be subject if the Court used the least serious count with which she was charged to calculate the range -- instead of, as the Guidelines direct, the most serious count -- and that the Court should vary Madrid's base offense level to 6, using the least serious count to calculate Madrid's Guidelines range, because using the most serious count to calculate Madrid's applicable Guidelines range results in U.S.S.G. § 2P1.2(c)(1)'s application, which unjustly elevates Madrid's base offense level to 26, disproportionate to the severity of her crime; and (v) whether, considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, the Court should assign Madrid a below-Guidelines sentence of 6 to 12 months imprisonment followed by a term of supervised release. The Court concludes that: (i) Suboxone quantity may not be calculated by dosage, and that the FBI agent's dosage determination is arbitrary, so the Court will sustain Madrid's Objection and will not consider as evidence relevant to sentencing the FBI agent's testimony as to the units of Suboxone or their value in prison, although the Court notes that the change does not affect Madrid's base offense level, which is 26; (ii) the Court overrules Madrid's Objection requesting a minor role adjustment, concluding that Madrid played an essential role when she purchased or secured the Suboxone and provided it to Chavez' attorney, Orlando Mondragon, for delivery, and where telephone calls between her and Chavez suggest this crime is not her first time securing Suboxone for an inmate; (iii) considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, including the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities between similar defendants found guilty of similar conduct, and a need to promote respect for thelaw, provide just punishment, afford just deterrence, and reflect the offense's seriousness, the Court denies Madrid's request to vary her sentence downward to eliminate the disparity between her sentence and Chavez' sentence; (iv) the Court declines to follow United States v. Cani, and assigns Madrid a base offense level of 26, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2P.12(c)(1); and (v) considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, the Court concludes Madrid is entitled to some variance, and varies downward the equivalent of 1 offense level, arriving at a working range of 63 to 78 months, below the advisory Guidelines range, and assigns Madrid a sentence of 63 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release, at the bottom of the working range. The Court therefore sustains the Objections in part and overrules them in part.
Indictment at 1. The Indictment also charges that Madrid, "contrary to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(E), provided and attempted to provide a prohibited object, specifically, suboxone, to CHRISTOPHER T. CHAVEZ, a.k.a. 'Critter,' an inmate of the Hidalgo County DetentionCenter . . . [i]n violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(1)." Indictment at 2 (emphasis in Indictment).
Chavez was originally charged in United States v. DeLeon, CR 15-4268 JB, a case dealing with crimes that a prison gang, the Syndicato de Nuevo Mexico ("SNM"), allegedly committed through its members. The factual background of that case, as incorporated into several of the Court's Memorandum Opinions and Orders, is provided below, including relevant footnotes:
To continue reading
Request your trial