United States v. Maryland Meyer, 543

Decision Date01 October 1963
Docket NumberNo. 543,543
Citation15 L.Ed.2d 226,382 U.S. 158,86 S.Ct. 304
PartiesUNITED STATES v. MARYLAND for the Use of Mary Jane MEYER et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

See 382 U.S. 1001, 86 S.Ct. 525.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.

Louis G. Davidson, Richard W. Galiher, William E. Stewart, Jr., and Peter J. McBreen, for respondents.

On Petition for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file a conditional petition for rehearing is granted and the petition for rehearing is also granted. The order of December 16, 1963, 375 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 445, 11 L.Ed.2d 314, denying the petition for writ of certiorari is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed in conformity with our decision in Maryland for the Use of Levin et al. v. United States, 381 U.S. 41, 85 S.Ct. 1293, 14 L.Ed.2d 205, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in respondents' bill of complaint.

It is so ordered.

Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court's order.

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Campins v. Capels
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 28, 1984
    ...to the injured party." United States v. Maryland, (D.C.Cir.1963) 322 F.2d 1009, 1016, rev'd on other grounds (1965) 382 U.S. 158, 86 S.Ct. 304, 15 L.Ed.2d 226; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Davis, (1966) 3 Ariz.App. 259, 413 P.2d 590; Florida Public Utilities Co. v. Wester, (1942......
  • State of Maryland v. Capital Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • April 3, 1967
    ...1236-59, Dec. 6, 1961, aff'd, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 259, 322 F.2d 1009 (1963), rev'd on the issue of agency and remanded, 382 U.S. 158, 86 S.Ct. 304, 15 L.Ed.2d 226 (1965), 257 F. Supp. 768 (D.D.C.1966); State of Maryland for the Use of Vance Lewman Brady, etc. v. United States, Civil No. 1237-5......
  • Trustees of University v. Vossoughi
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 2009
    ...22. United States v. Maryland, 116 U.S.App. D.C. 259, 266, 322 F.2d 1009, 1016 (1963), rev'd on other grounds, 382 U.S. 158, 86 S.Ct. 304, 15 L.Ed.2d 226 (1965). See also Am. Serv. Ctr. Assocs. v. Helton, 867 A.2d 235, 242 (D.C.2005) ("[N]o single fixed rule for recovery of damages for inju......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT