United States v. Massei

Decision Date03 March 1958
Docket NumberNo. 98,98
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. William V. MASSEI
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Roger Fisher, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Mr. Richard Maguire, Boston, Mass., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Appeals has based its remand in part on the absence of 'proof of likely source,' which it regards as an 'indispensable' element of the net worth method citing Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127, 99 L.Ed. 150, in support of its conclusion. In Holland we held that proof of a likely source was 'sufficient' to convict in a net worth case where the Government did not negative all the possible nontaxable sources of the alleged net worth increase. This was not intended to imply that proof of a likely source was necessary in every case. On the contrary, should all possible sources of nontaxable income be negatived, there would be no necessity for proof of a likely source. The above explanation must be taken into consideration in applying the Holland doctrine to this case. A new trial being permissible under the terms of the order of the Court of Appeals, we affirm its judgment.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS would affirm the judgment below on the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 1 Cir., 241 F.2d 895, 900—901.

To continue reading

Request your trial
191 cases
  • DiLeo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • June 24, 1991
    ...taxpayer alleges a nontaxable source, respondent may satisfy his burden by disproving the nontaxable source so alleged. United States v. Massei, 355 U.S. 595 (1958); Parks v. Commissioner, supra at 661. Respondent submitted into evidence bank records, deposit slips and checks showing that s......
  • U.S. v. Scott
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • January 18, 1982
    ...income and his putative income was taxable income, or that no nontaxable source for the difference existed. United States v. Massei, 355 U.S. 595, 78 S.Ct. 495, 2 L.Ed.2d 517 (1958). Finally, because the net worth method of proof rests solely on circumstantial and indirect evidence, the gov......
  • United States v. Goichman
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • January 20, 1976
    ...claims the excess is taxable income which was not reported. Holland, supra, 348 U.S. at 125, 75 S.Ct. 127, United States v. Massei, 355 U.S. 595, 78 S.Ct. 495, 2 L.Ed.2d 517 (1958). The Government has the burden of proving the opening net worth figure with "reasonable certainty." Holland, s......
  • Factor v. CIR
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 27, 1960
    ...C.I.R., supra Note 14, 251 F.2d at page 321; Clark v. C.I.R., supra Note 17, 266 F. 2d at pages 708-709. 28 United States v. Massei, 1958, 355 U.S. 595, 78 S.Ct. 495, 2 L.Ed.2d 517. Apposite to the facts here is the language of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a similar "Where,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT