United States v. McCabe, 16903.

Decision Date07 October 1969
Docket NumberNo. 16903.,16903.
Citation416 F.2d 957
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morgan L. McCABE, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Edward J. Calihan, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Morgan L. McCabe, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant-appellant.

James B. Brennan, U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., Roch Carter, Robert J. Lerner, Asst. U. S. Attys., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SWYGERT, FAIRCHILD and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges.

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.

Morgan McCabe was convicted of willfully failing to file income tax returns for 1960, 1961, and 1962.1 He was sentenced to 45 days' imprisonment and fines aggregating $3,000.

Jury trial was waived. The parties stipulated that McCabe had gross incomes in these years ranging from $35,000 to $38,000 and that he had not filed. The only remaining issue was whether or not the failure was wilful. McCabe claimed a belief that he was not required to file since his returns would show no taxable income.

The government produced proof from which it could readily be inferred that McCabe knew he was required to file.

As a result of prodding by state authorities he had, in 1960, filed state and federal returns for 1957, 1958, and 1959. Those returns were prepared by an attorney and showed net losses.

On April 17, 1962, Mr. McCabe applied for an extension to June 15 of the time within which to file for 1961. He noted in his letter that his return would show a tax loss. He also stated that he had been ill during most of 1961 and part of 1962. The extension was granted. At trial there was proof that he had no such extended illness.

On April 15, 1963, he applied for an extension to June 15 of the time within which to file for 1962. He stated that returns had not been filed for 1960 and 1961 and gave the same reason for not filing for those years as for the need for an extension, i. e., a description of what he termed "problems and frustrations" concerning companies in which he was interested and the resulting effect on his health. He stated he had employed a Miss Dunn to compile information so that his lawyer could file returns for all three years. The extension was granted.

Although McCabe was indicted in August, 1966, he still had not filed returns at the time of trial in October, 1967.

The evidence referred to would amply support findings that defendant knew the law required him to file returns and that he deliberately failed to file without justifiable excuse. Such failure necessarily prevented the government from knowing the extent of his tax liability, and his intent so to prevent it may be inferred. These elements, taken together, amount to wilfulness.2 The government was not required to prove that McCabe owed any tax.3

McCabe testified that he did not file because of his belief that he had no taxable income for those years and that a return is not required unless one has $600 of taxable income. The district judge was, and could properly be, convinced that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Petzoldt v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • March 29, 1989
    ...prior history of filing tax returns indicates that he was well aware of his duty to file tax returns. See United States v. McCabe, 416 F.2d 957 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 1058 (1970) (taxpayer's filing of timely returns in prior years is evidence which permits the inference that......
  • State v. Fendler, s. 1
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 11, 1980
    ...are also indicative of appellant's awareness of his obligation to file, despite the fact that no taxes were due. United States v. McCabe, 416 F.2d 957 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1058, 90 S.Ct. 751, 24 L.Ed.2d 752 (1970); United States v. Garguilo, 554 F.2d 59 (2nd Cir. 1977); U......
  • United States v. Moses
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • May 18, 1981
    ...United States v. Wade, 585 F.2d 573, 574 (5th Cir. 1979). The government also need not prove that the tax was due. United States v. McCabe, 416 F.2d 957, 958 (7th Cir. 1969). Defendant's contention that the "gist" of a Section 7203 prosecution lies in the "understatement of income" is erron......
  • People v. Mojica
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 25, 2006
    ...misdemeanor tax evasion statute, which does not require proof of a tax deficiency as an element of the offense. (United States v. McCabe (7th Cir.1969) 416 F.2d 957, 958.) It arrives at this conclusion by citing to People v. Smith (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 1103, 203 Cal.Rptr. 196, (Smith), a pr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT