United States v. McCandless

Decision Date11 March 1931
Docket NumberNo. 4447.,4447.
PartiesUNITED STATES ex rel. FITLEBERG v. McCANDLESS, Commissioner of Immigration.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Adrian Bonnelly, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Isador Worth, of Riverside, N. J., for appellee.

Before DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON and THOMPSON, District Judges.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge (sworn in as Circuit Judge February 3, 1931).

This is an appeal by Jacob Fitleberg, relator appellant, from the decree of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, upon habeas corpus proceedings, remanding him to the custody of the immigration authorities for deportation to England.

The facts, as shown by the record, are as follows:

The appellant was born in 1901 at Liverpool, England, of parents born in Germany. His father went to Canada to reside prior to 1912 or 1913, when the appellant went with his mother by the steamship Laurentic from England to Quebec, Canada. He lived with his parents in Montreal and remained there until 1923. In that year he went from Windsor, Ontario, to Detroit, Mich., falsely representing to the immigration authorities that he was going to remain in the United States for a day or two. He remained five or six months and then returned to Canada. In November, 1924, he again crossed the border from Windsor to Detroit, remained there six months, and then returned to Canada, where he remained for ten months. In February, 1926, he returned to the United States, remained until June, 1926, and then went back to Montreal. In December, 1926, he again crossed to Detroit. He did not pay a head tax at any time when he entered the United States, and knew that he was in this country unlawfully.

In March, 1927, he was arrested in Detroit and extradited to Windsor, Canada, to answer a criminal charge of obtaining money under false pretense at Montreal. While under arrest at Windsor, upon examination by the Canadian immigration authorities, he falsely stated that he was married, that he was born in Philadelphia, and that his name was Jimmy Wilson. He was taken to Montreal, and in June, 1927, was acquitted of the criminal charge. He was deported from Canada to the United States and delivered by the Canadian immigration officers to the immigration officers of the United States and taken into custody by them at Rouses Point, N. Y., on September 23, 1927. On September 26, a hearing was had at which the foregoing facts were developed, and it was also developed that he was afflicted with a dangerous and loathsome contagious disease. He was not in possession of an unexpired visa, and was never legally admitted to the United States.

The appellant claimed at the hearings before the immigration authorities that he had become a citizen of Canada through the naturalization there of his father. But beyond his statement there has been no documentary or other evidence to sustain that claim. The Canadian authorities have absolutely refused to permit his return to Canada, upon the ground that he has no legal status there, he having been born in Liverpool, England. Consent to his deportation to England was granted through the British Embassy at Washington. The Secretary of Labor, having found from the proofs that the appellant was found in the United States in violation of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, issued a warrant for his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • United States v. Spar
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 8, 1945
    ...Frick, 233 U.S. 291, 34 S.Ct. 488, 58 L.Ed. 967; United States ex rel. Karamian v. Curran, 2 Cir., 16 F.2d 958; United States ex rel. Fitleberg v. McCandless, 3 Cir., 47 F.2d 683; Johnson v. Weedin, 9 Cir., 16 F.2d 105; United States ex rel. Di Battista v. Hughes, 3 Cir., 299 F. 99. And the......
  • United States v. Watkins, 281
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 23, 1947
    ...United States ex rel. Ling Yee Suey v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881; Blumen v. Haff, 9 Cir., 78 F.2d 833; United States ex rel. Fitleberg v. McCandless, 3 Cir., 47 F.2d 683. Each of these authorities we think distinguishable. The first involved Chinese members of the crew who were arrested by......
  • Brown v. United States, 5883.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 12, 1931
  • United States v. Karnuth, 2252A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • December 7, 1938
    ...with relator's arrest in Massachusetts and his removal to Canada. Gomes v. Tillinghast, D.C., 37 F.2d 935; U. S. ex rel. Fitleberg v. McCandless, 3 Cir., 47 F.2d 683, and Blumen v. Haff, 9 Cir., 78 F.2d 833, to which the court's attention has been directed by the respondent, each involved t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT