United States v. Melendez-Gonzalez

Docket Number17-1084,17-1113
Decision Date04 June 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
  • United States v. Velazquez-Fontanez
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • July 27, 2021
    ...in the light most favorable to the verdict and draw all reasonable inferences in the verdict's favor, see United States v. Meléndez-González, 892 F.3d 9, 17 (1st Cir. 2018). Our task is to determine "whether ‘any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime be......
  • United States v. Nishiie
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii
    • September 27, 2019
    ...that it was not, the Tenth Circuit declined to apply the WSLA to toll the running of the limitations period. United States v. Melendez-Gonzalez , 892 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2018), did apply the WSLA to fraud committed in connection with recruiting for the National Guard. The case did not discuss ......
  • United States v. Gurry
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • November 26, 2019
    ...well as all plausible inferences drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the verdict," United States v. Meléndez-González, 892 F.3d 9, 17 (1st Cir. 2018) (internal quotations omitted). The verdict will be upheld if it is "supported by a plausible rendition of the record." Merlino, 5......
  • United States v. Facteau
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • September 14, 2020
    ...well as all plausible inferences drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the verdict," United States v. Meléndez-González, 892 F.3d 9, 17 (1st Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). The verdict will be upheld if it is "supported by a plausible rendition of the record." Merli......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • FEDERAL CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 58-3, July 2021
    • July 1, 2021
    ...Cir. 2015))); see also United States v. Hamilton, 929F.3d 943, 945 (8th Cir. 2019).25. See, e.g., United States v. Mele´ndez-Gonza´lez, 892 F.3d 9, 17–18 (1st Cir. 2018) (f‌inding that theevidence was suff‌icient to prove that defendant had conspired with some other person); United States v......
  • Federal Criminal Conspiracy
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 59-3, July 2022
    • July 1, 2022
    ...entered into more than buyer-seller relationships with other co-conspirators”). 27. See, e.g. , United States v. Meléndez-González, 892 F.3d 9, 17–18 (1st Cir. 2018) (f‌inding that the evidence was suff‌icient to prove that defendant had conspired with some other person); United States v. M......