United States v. Miranda, 25111.
| Citation | 426 F.2d 283 |
| Decision Date | 24 April 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 25111.,25111. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luciano Abreu MIRANDA, Appellant. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
William M. Apgar (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
Luciano Abreu Miranda appeals from his conviction, on a jury verdict, of smuggling 143 pounds of marihuana into the United States from Mexico on January 16, 1969, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a.
Defendant's only point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the marihuana seized as a result of a search of his automobile, and in thereafter receiving evidence pertaining to the marihuana.
An immigration and customs checkpoint is maintained about eighteen miles north of Oceanside, California. This checkpoint is therefore sixty or seventy miles north of the Mexican border and about one-half mile from the Pacific Ocean. On January 16, 1969, Bruce R. Stock, a border patrolman apparently operating out of that checkpoint, stopped defendant in his 1968 Chevrolet automobile on Interstate 5, not far from the checkpoint. Stock was searching for aliens not lawfully admitted into the United States.
Stock questioned defendant and the latter presented a form I-151, identifying himself as a lawfully-immigrated alien. For the purpose of determining whether an alien was hidden under the hood of the automobile, Stock requested Miranda to open the hood. Miranda appeared nervous; his hand shook violently as he was taking the key out of the ignition and trying to open the hood. Under the hood Stock found no aliens, but he did find twenty-four bricks of marihuana in the fender wells. Stock then searched other parts of the car, including the area behind the back seat rest and under the rear seat cushion. He found forty-one more bricks of marihuana in these places.
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a) (3) a properly authorized officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, such as Stock, is empowered, without a warrant, to board and search any vehicle for aliens "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States * * *." According to the applicable regulation, the term "reasonable distance" means within one hundred air miles from any external boundary of the United States or any shorter distance which may be fixed by the district director. 8 C.F.R. § 287.1(a) (2). This regulation, and the statute upon which it is based, 8 U.S.C. § 1357...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Peltier 8212 2000
...attack.' Ante, at 2319. But the first decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit squarely in point, United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283, was decided in 1970, and the second, United States v. Sanchez, 452 F.2d 459, was decided over strong dissent in 1971 and was pending on cer......
-
United States v. Almeida-Sanchez
...cause. Duprez v. United States (9 Cir. 1970) 435 F.2d 1276; Fumagalli v. United States (9 Cir. 1970) 429 F.2d 1011; Miranda v. United States (9 Cir. 1970) 426 F.2d 283. A stop and search effected under 8 U.S.C. § 1357 is not a "border search" and does not depend for its validity upon the la......
-
U.S. v. Peltier
...that government agents on roving patrol can stop and search automobiles without either probable cause or warrant. United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1970). All of our other pre-Almeida-Sanchez decisions upholding roving-patrol searches away from the border involved stops that ......
-
U.S. v. Bowen
...a roving-patrol search, supported by neither warrant nor probable cause, was not upheld by this circuit until 1970 (United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1970)), a mere two years before certiorari was granted in Almeida-Sanchez (406 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 2050, 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972))......
-
When the constable behaves and the courts blunder: expanding the good-faith exception in the wake of Arizona v. Gant.
...provide any support for the constitutionality of the stop and search in the present case .... "). (164.) See United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283, 284 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam) (upholding constitutionality of roving patrol searches without "reasonable suspicion" requirement); Roa-Rodri......
-
Founded Suspicion: the Ninth Circuit's Response to Almeida Sanchez
...429 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1970) (agent discovered marijuana when looking inside a trunk for illegal aliens); United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1970) (agent discovered marijuana when looking under the hood of the automobile for aliens); Roa Rodri quez v. United States, 410 F.2d ......