United States v. Mitchell, 72-2032.
| Decision Date | 07 May 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 72-2032.,72-2032. |
| Citation | 472 F.2d 1223 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald C. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Suzanne E. Graber (argued), San Rafael, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Thomas T. Couris, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Richard V. Boulger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before KOELSCH, CHOY, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
Certiorari Denied May 7, 1973. See 93 S.Ct. 2162.
Mitchell appeals from a conviction for willfully supplying false income-tax-withholding information in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7205. His principal contention is that the district court erred when it granted his request to proceed in propria persona. The record reveals that Mitchell was clearly advised of his right to have counsel appointed. While we would have preferred the record to have shown that the district court had advised Mitchell more fully of the consequences of his choice (cf. Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708, 723-724, 68 S.Ct. 316, 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948)), or that it had instructed Mitchell to consult with an attorney for advice on the wisdom of dispensing with counsel (see A.B.A. Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Providing Defense Services § 7.3 (1968)), we are persuaded that Mitchell's decision to defend himself was voluntary and intelligent within the meaning of Hodge v. United States, 414 F.2d 1040 (9th Cir. 1969) (en banc).
Other alleged errors discussed in the briefs do not suggest a basis for reversal.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Frias-Ramirez
...670 F.2d 849 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Benito FRIAS-RAMIREZ, ... ...
-
Meeks v. Craven
...that he did not understand what he was doing or that the court should have forced counsel upon him. See, e. g., United States v. Mitchell, 472 F.2d 1223 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 972, 93 S.Ct. 2162, 36 L.Ed.2d 695 (1973). We can find no constitutional rationale for placing tri......
-
U.S. v. Stanley, 78-1924
...601 F.2d 380 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Frank D. STANLEY, ... ...
-
United States v. Dujanovic
...on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Providing Defense Services § 7.3 (1968)), . . ." United States v. Mitchell, 472 F.2d 1223 (9th Cir. 1972). "`While an accused may waive the right to counsel, whether there is an intelligent and competent waiver should be clear......