United States v. Morales

Docket Number09-2863
Decision Date18 August 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • Perez v. People
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • April 8, 2013
    ...occupations, addresses, exact places of employment, and other such facts–ha[d] been withheld from the parties.” United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608, 620 (7th Cir.2011). Federal statute allows federal district courts to keep the names of jurors “confidential in any case where the interest......
  • United States v. Schiro
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • May 1, 2012
    ...v. Mannie, 509 F.3d 851, 856-57 (7th Cir. 2007); see also Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534, 537-39 (1993); United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608, 624-25 (7th Cir. 2011). Anthony Doyle's appellate counsel makes a number of convoluted objections to the jury instructions. Doyle's trial c......
  • United States v. Haywood
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of Illinois
    • October 21, 2019
    ...grounds to require a severance unless the defendant also shows prejudice to some specific trial right."); United States v. Morales , 655 F.3d 608, 625 (7th Cir. 2011) ("In the end, however, Rule 14 does not require severance even if prejudice is shown; rather, it leaves the tailoring of the......
  • United States v. Amaya
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • June 3, 2016
    ...no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Morales , 655 F.3d 608, 634 (7th Cir. 2011) (citation and quotation marks omitted). As to the gun charge, Amaya also raises two evidentiary issues. First, he argue......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The constitutional right to an implicit bias jury instruction
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 59-2, April 2022
    • April 1, 2022
    ...1, 38 n.186 (2014) (citing GEORGE FISHER, EVIDENCE 2-3 (3d ed. 2013)). 111. FED. R. EVID. 606(b)(1). 112. See United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608, 629–32 (7th Cir. 2011). 113. See Bradford v. City of Los Angeles, No. CV 90-0128, 1994 WL 118091 at *5 (9th Cir. 1994). 114. FED. R. EVID. 60......
  • IX. Disclosing the Identity of Jurors
    • United States
    • The Rights of the Accused under the Sixth Amendment (ABA) Chapter 3 The Right to a Jury Trial
    • Invalid date
    ...303 F.3d 606 (5th Cir. 2002).[191] . United States v. Dinkins, 691 F.3d 358, 373 (4th Cir. 2012). See also United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608 (7th Cir. 2011); People v. Rizo, 302 P.3d 284 (Colo. App. 2011); State v. Sandoval, 788 N.W.2d 172 (Neb. 2010).[192] . United States v. Ross, 33 ......