United States v. Morgan
| Docket Number | 12-1408,12-1442,13-1032 |
| Decision Date | 09 April 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
99 cases
-
United States v. Deleon
...of the [statement is] to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.’ " United States v. Morgan, 748 F.3d 1024, 1048 (10th Cir. 2014) (alteration in original)(quoting United States v. Smalls, 605 F.3d 765, 777-78 (10th Cir. 2010) ). Accord United State......
-
United States v. Protho
...550 (9th Cir. 1995) ("[C]ars are themselves instrumentalities of commerce, which Congress may protect."); cf. United States v. Morgan , 748 F.3d 1024, 1034 (10th Cir. 2014) (holding that cellphones, the internet, and GPS devices are instrumentalities of interstate commerce for purposes of t......
-
United States v. Deleon
...of the [statement is] to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.' " United States v. Morgan, 748 F.3d 1024, 1048 (10th Cir. 2014) (alteration in original)(quoting United States v. Smalls, 605 F.3d at 777–78 ). Accord United States v. Chaco, 801 F.S......
-
United States v. Roof
...to the Government could conclude that the Government established an interstate commerce nexus. See, e.g., United States v. Morgan , 748 F.3d 1024, 1034 (10th Cir. 2014) (holding that a GPS device is an instrumentality of interstate commerce); United States v. MacEwan , 445 F.3d 237, 245 (3d......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Broad-banned: the Fcc's Preemption of State Limits on Municipal Broadband and the Clear Statement Rule
...and channel of interstate commerce." (quoting United States v. Havlik, 710 F.3d 818, 824 (8th Cir. 2013))); United States v. Morgan, 748 F.3d 1024, 1033 (10th Cir. 2014) ("We have decided the Internet is an instrumentality of interstate commerce.").200. 47 U.S.C. § 1302(a)-(b) (2012); see s......