United States v. Naylor
| Docket Number | 16-2047 |
| Decision Date | 05 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
47 cases
-
Mitchell v. Warden, FCI-Greenville
...the Missouri burglary statutes under which Mitchell was convicted do not support an ACCA enhancement after Mathis. United States v. Naylor, 887 F.3d 397, 400 (8th Cir. 2018). Because Mitchell, unlike the petitioners in Carson and Wilson, affirmatively reserved theright to collaterally attac......
-
Kirk v. Schaeffler Grp. USA, Inc.
... ... SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC.; FAG Bearings, LLC, Defendants-Appellants No. 16-3417 United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 21, 2017 Filed: April 5, 2018 Counsel ... ...
-
Olmsted v. United States
...in Missouri no longer qualify as "violent felonies" under to the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), pursuant to United States v. Naylor , 887 F.3d 397 (8th Cir. 2018). Doc. 1, p. 4. The Government agrees that Movant is entitled to be resentenced without the ACCA enhancement. Doc. 5. Nevert......
-
Walker v. United States
...light of recent decisions. See Mathis v. United States , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016) ; United States v. Naylor , 887 F.3d 397 (8th Cir. 2018) (en banc). We review de novo the denial of a § 2255 motion. Holloway v. United States , 960 F.2d 1348, 1351 (8th Cir. 1992)......
Get Started for Free