United States v. Nelson, No. 12–30101.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtHIGGINSON
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Thomas A. NELSON, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.
Docket NumberNo. 12–30101.
Decision Date14 October 2013

732 F.3d 504

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee
v.
Thomas A. NELSON, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.

No. 12–30101.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 14, 2013.


[732 F.3d 509]


Mary Patricia Jones, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Belina S. Dayries, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Corey Ross Amundson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff–Appellee.

Page Anthony Pate, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant–Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Thomas A. Nelson, Jr., the former mayor of New Roads, Louisiana, appeals his conviction for corruption-related offenses, along with the district court's calculation of his sentencing range. For the reasons articulated below, we AFFIRM Nelson's conviction, VACATE his sentence, and REMAND for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Facts

The government's interest in Nelson arose from its undercover investigation of another Louisiana mayor, George Grace. As part of that investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents and paid cooperating witness William Myles posed as representatives of a waste container cleaning system business known as the Cifer 5000 (“Cifer”). The FBI instructed Myles, a businessman with a real estate development background, to be “very overt” about his willingness to participate in corrupt activity to obtain government contracts.

Through his conversations with Grace, Myles discovered that Grace considered Nelson, along with four other mayors, to be part of a close-knit group that Grace

[732 F.3d 510]

was “training.” Although Myles may have been the first to use the term “A–Team” to describe this group, Grace picked up on the moniker. Grace identified Nelson as likely willing to accept cash, rather than stock options, in exchange for helping Cifer. Grace also singled out another member of this group of five as a “clean” politician who would want to do things “straight up,” which Myles understood to imply that the others would not.

Myles, at Grace's suggestion, invited Grace, Nelson, and Lewis, another member of Grace's A–Team, to dinner at a steak house in Baton Rouge in August 2008. Myles paid for dinner and made it “absolutely” clear that he was trying to get contracts for Cifer's services in the mayors' towns. On October 1, 2008, Myles and Grace met privately to discuss the A–Team mayors further; Grace told Myles that the other mayors would “listen and do what I tell them.” After Myles mentioned “tak[ing] care of” the mayors in return for Cifer contracts in their towns, Grace said, “Well, I know Nelson, from New Roads. He ready to go.” Grace also instructed Myles that he would act as a middleman between Myles and the other mayors. According to Grace, the mayors trusted Grace enough to believe that he would take the fall if the group got into trouble.

Myles and FBI special agents, in their undercover capacity as Cifer representatives, met with Grace, Nelson, and two other A–Team mayors at Myles's New Orleans condo on October 6, 2008. Myles had asked Grace not to invite the mayor whom Grace identified as “clean.” Cifer paid for the mayors' hotel rooms for the night and provided them with tickets to a Saints game. At the meeting, Myles explained to the mayors the legal bidding process for securing public contracts, but also told the group: “I might not even talk to you outside of this room but this is the group that helping us and since y'all guys willing to help us, we willing to help you guys.” After Nelson expressed particular enthusiasm for Cifer, one of the agents asked whether Nelson could secure the contract himself or whether it would need to be put to a city council vote. Nelson responded: “[Y]ou're talking about RFPs [a step in the formal bidding process] and all those thing[s], but you could—I could probably look at it almost as a professional service.” He continued: “So if it's a professional service, then I make the call.... The Council doesn't make the call on that.” Myles understood Nelson to mean that he was willing to circumvent the RFP bidding process.

At some point during the evening, Grace and an FBI agent, Johnson, went into another room and Johnson gave Grace $2,000 in cash. Later that night, Grace came to Nelson's hotel room and gave Nelson $300 in cash, telling him the money was from Johnson. Grace told Nelson that he could “do whatever he wanted” with the money, but Nelson later characterized the $300 payment as a quid pro quo: “If I'm going to accept, I mean I couldn't, you know, I'm going to perform.” Nelson and one of the other mayors agreed that they would not speak about the payments again.

Nelson met with Cifer “businessmen,” including Myles and Johnson, again on October 30, 2008. At that meeting, Nelson accepted $400 in cash from Johnson and a ticket to a Hornets game from Myles. The group discussed having Nelson write an official “letter of support” to give to investors. The next day, October 31, 2008, Nelson told Myles: “Y'all tell me when the time is right to make the move on, we can do it. And the sooner we get this knocked out, then we can get the other little deal I was telling you about.” Myles testified that the “other little deal” referred to Nelson seeking financial backing for his own business venture, a “video bingo” project.

[732 F.3d 511]

On November 11, 2008, Nelson sent a letter to a “private investment group,” Quorum Venture Group, which had also been set up by the FBI, in support of Cifer. In the letter, Nelson noted that New Roads was “committed to working towards a contract with” Cifer. Nelson also drafted a proposed city ordinance requiring the cleanliness of garbage cans in order to benefit Cifer. He published an article in support of the ordinance in the local paper.

On January 27, 2009, Nelson replied to Johnson's offer of a silent partnership in Cifer by saying: “That sounds good.... I'm with that.” A few days later, Nelson told Myles that Johnson had “told me some stuff that made me—I'm even more ready to roll than y'all.” During this time, Nelson also sought Cifer representatives' financial backing for several business ventures of his own.

In February 2009, Nelson instructed a city employee to send a request to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, seeking support for legislation favorable to Cifer. On March 4, 2009, Johnson offered Nelson $20,000 in stock in an electronic medical records business in exchange for Nelson's support of Cifer; Nelson agreed. Johnson told Nelson they could delay the decision, but Nelson said that he was “ready right now.” In April 2009, Nelson solicited football playoff tickets from FBI undercover agent Mike King while rejecting a similar offer from a representative of another company. Nelson told King that he trusted Cifer.

King offered Nelson $20,000 in cash, instead of stock, on May 20, 2009. Nelson refused, saying he preferred the stock because it could “bring so much more in the future.” But in July, Nelson changed his mind about preferring stock to cash after hearing of an undercover FBI operation involving public officials in New Jersey. King reassured Nelson that he could decline the bribe altogether, saying: “If you're comfortable [helping Cifer] for the right reasons, let's do it for the right reasons.” Nelson continued to request the cash. On September 16, 2009, Nelson told King he wanted to be paid in a week. Nelson accepted $5,000 on September 24, 2009, and another $5,000 on October 8, 2009. King told Nelson he would get the remaining $10,000 when Cifer was set up in New Roads.

In October 2009, Nelson used New Roads's “robo call” system to disseminate a pre-recorded message to the town's residents, from him as mayor. The message described the Cifer system and stated that “we are not advocating that the Cifer 5000 alone will cure the H1N1 outbreak, what we are saying is that your risk of contracting this virus or any other will be significantly minimized.” The message ended by asking the recipient to press a button on their keypad if he or she is “interested in the Cifer 5000 performing this service in our community for a short period of time free of charge.”

In April 2010, Nelson was interviewed by an FBI agent about a report by the City of New Roads that city offices might have been bugged by a disgruntled employee; when asked if he had been bribed, Nelson failed to mention his involvement with Cifer.

Nelson contacted Myles on April 26, 2010, to say that he was running for re-election and he needed Cifer trucks “on the ground” in New Roads, as well as money for campaign funds. Nelson told Myles that Johnson should “empty his pockets” and give Nelson the remaining $10,000. Nelson later told Myles that if he did not receive the money within a week, he would impose interest “so high where y'all can't make it up.” Myles promised to give Nelson the money, but only if Nelson would award Myles a city contract for

[732 F.3d 512]

Cifer's services in the fall. Nelson agreed and also agreed to provide an official letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in support of Cifer's grant request.

Nelson sent a letter on Cifer's behalf to the EPA Administrator, signed and printed on mayoral letterhead, on May 3, 2010. The letter was written mainly by undercover agents but edited by Nelson; it read in part:

Recently, I met with other mayors from Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana, and there was an overwhelming interest from the mayors in a technology like the Cifer 5000. A municipal joint venture was discussed wherein any federal financial assistance from the EPA would be shared parish-wide in order to afford many cities the opportunity to implement a regimented sanitation container cleaning system in compliance with the EPA rules and regulations.

At trial, the government introduced evidence that the meeting between Nelson and the other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 practice notes
  • United States v. Fairley, No. 17-60001
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • January 22, 2018
    ...itself must be considered, but the proponent cannot establish admissibility based on the statement alone. UnitedStates v. Nelson , 732 F.3d 504, 516 (5th Cir. 2013). "There must be 'independent evidence' establishing the conspiracy." Id. (quoting United States v. El–Mezain , 664 F.3d 467, 5......
  • United States v. Madrid, No. 13-50414
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • June 24, 2015
    ...his conviction. "A district court's admission of evidence, if objected to, is reviewed for abuse of discretion." United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 516-17 (5th Cir. 2013).23 Even when the district court abuses its discretion by admitting inadmissible evidence, however, we must "view the......
  • United States v. Harris, No. 15–50106.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • April 28, 2016
    ...the amount of loss, as well as its interpretations of the meaning of a sentencing guideline, de novo. ” United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 520 (5th Cir.2013) (citations omitted). Because Harris challenges the district court's method of determining the loss amount for purposes of § 2B1.1......
  • Odeh v. United States, Civ. No. 3:13-CV-4299-P
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • March 30, 2015
    ...displayed 'significant hesitation or unwillingness, or attempt[ed] to return discussions to lawful conduct.'" United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 514 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting Theagene, 565 F.3d at 920). In contrast, evidence of predisposition can be shown by "active, enthusiastic partici......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
48 cases
  • United States v. Fairley, No. 17-60001
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • January 22, 2018
    ...itself must be considered, but the proponent cannot establish admissibility based on the statement alone. UnitedStates v. Nelson , 732 F.3d 504, 516 (5th Cir. 2013). "There must be 'independent evidence' establishing the conspiracy." Id. (quoting United States v. El–Mezain , 664 F.3d 467, 5......
  • United States v. Madrid, No. 13-50414
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • June 24, 2015
    ...his conviction. "A district court's admission of evidence, if objected to, is reviewed for abuse of discretion." United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 516-17 (5th Cir. 2013).23 Even when the district court abuses its discretion by admitting inadmissible evidence, however, we must "view the......
  • United States v. Harris, No. 15–50106.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • April 28, 2016
    ...the amount of loss, as well as its interpretations of the meaning of a sentencing guideline, de novo. ” United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 520 (5th Cir.2013) (citations omitted). Because Harris challenges the district court's method of determining the loss amount for purposes of § 2B1.1......
  • Odeh v. United States, Civ. No. 3:13-CV-4299-P
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • March 30, 2015
    ...displayed 'significant hesitation or unwillingness, or attempt[ed] to return discussions to lawful conduct.'" United States v. Nelson, 732 F.3d 504, 514 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting Theagene, 565 F.3d at 920). In contrast, evidence of predisposition can be shown by "active, enthusiastic partici......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT