United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 21 January 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 8061.,8061. |
Citation | 30 F.2d 655 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
O. R. McGuire, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. (Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lafayette French, Jr., U. S. Atty., of Austin, Minn., on the brief), for the United States.
M. L. Countryman, Jr., of St. Paul, Minn. (C. W. Bunn and D. F. Lyons, both of St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before VAN VALKENBURGH and BOOTH, Circuit Judges, and POLLOCK, District Judge.
Defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought suit against the United States of America, defendant below, to recover the sum of $1.60 — the difference between a net per capita fare of $33.09, claimed by the plaintiff for transporting two members of the United States Marine Corps from St. Paul, Minn., to Seattle, Wash., and a net per capita fare of $32.29, paid for the transportation and accepted by the railroad company under protest. This suit is the result of a disagreement between the parties as to the proper computation of land grant deductions from the commercial fare over the route traveled. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. The court ruled in favor of the railroad and entered judgment accordingly. In the stipulation as to the facts it was agreed that the Northern Pacific Railway Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Wisconsin, and is engaged in the operation of various lines of railroad into and through the states of Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Washington, and Oregon, and is a common carrier of freight and passengers. It maintains its principal operating and business offices in the city of St. Paul in the state of Minnesota.
The original line of railroad under the Act of July 2, 1864, was from Ashland, Wis., on the shores of Lake Superior, through Brainerd, Minn., and Meeker, Wash., to Tacoma, Wash., on Puget's Sound. Later a line of railroad, now owned and operated by the Northern Pacific Railway Company, was constructed between St. Paul, Minn., and Brainerd, Minn., intersecting the original line at the latter point; this line, prior to its acquisition by plaintiff, had been constructed by various corporations and the portion thereof between Watab and Brainerd had been granted lands in aid of that construction. The plaintiff company also operates by lease over a land grant railroad between St. Paul and Minneapolis, a distance of 8.23 miles. In the year 1890 the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, plaintiff's predecessor, purchased a line of railroad from Meeker, Wash., a point on its original line, to Seattle, Wash. The total line of railroad between St. Paul and Seattle, through Brainerd, Minn., and Meeker, Wash., contains 1,962.21 miles of road, of which 1,855.67 miles were constructed by aid of grants of lands subject to the conditions hereinabove stated as to government transportation, the ratio of land grant to the total length of the road being 47.285 per cent. We quote from paragraph 8 of the agreed statement of facts:
The ratio of land grant to the total length of the road computed by this route is 46.001 per cent. From the foregoing it will be seen that the mileage traversed by through trains between St. Paul, Minn., and Seattle, Wash., has been reduced from the original mileage by 47.64 miles and the land grant mileage by 94.24 miles. Pursuant to the power to regulate charges for government transportation conferred by the Act of July 2, 1864, Congress has provided that the rate for such transportation shall not exceed 50 per cent. of the full amount of compensation computed on the basis of the tariff or lower special rates for like transportation performed for the public at large. Under Joint Military Passenger Agreement No. 2, effective July 1, 1924, the government is entitled to an additional 3 per cent. reduction from the rates charged the public at large. The contentions of the parties respecting the proper deductions to the government from the commercial fare is thus stated in the stipulation of facts:
The situation with respect to transportation, due to the cut-offs between Little Falls and Staples, and between Palmer Junction and East Albany, is thus stated in paragraph 9 of the stipulation:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Southern Pac Co v. United States
...line substituted in whole or in part for the longer aided and original line. See stipulations of the parties in United States v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 30 F.2d 655. This long established rule has been acquiesced in by land-grant railroads generally and was acquiesced in by this p......
-
Smith v. Morris
...SCt 163, 72 LEd 427; State v. Lumber Co., 321 Mo. 461, 12 SW2d 64; Huntsville Trust Co. v. Noel, 321 Mo. 749, 12 SW2d 751; US v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. (CCA) 30 F2d 655; Brewster v. Gage (CCA) 30 F2d 604; US v. Payne (DC) 30 F2d 960; Marinette, T. & W. Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission of Wisco......
- International Indemnity Co. v. Steil