United States v. Pace
| Docket Number | 21-2151 |
| Decision Date | 09 September 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
19 cases
-
United States v. Garcon
... ... Lopez , 998 F.3d 431, 440 (9th Cir. 2021). Today's dissent, adopting the government's position and joining the Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits, disagrees. See Dissenting Op. at 1299–1303; United States v. Palomares , 52 F.4th 640, 640–45 (5th Cir. 2022) ; United States v. Pace , 48 F.4th 741, 754–55 (7th Cir. 2022) ; United States v. Pulsifer , 39 F.4th 1018, 1021–22 (8th Cir. 2022). Here's the thing, though: Even if the government and today's dissenters had the stronger position in the surplusage battle, they wouldn't win the interpretive war. The reason: The ... ...
-
United States v. Palomares, 21-40247
... ... Pulsifer , 39 F.4th 1018, 1022 (8th Cir. 2022) (concluding that the introductory phrase "does not have" found in § 3553(f)(1) "distributes" across each statutory condition in § 3553(f)(1)(A)–(C) ), and United States v. Pace , 48 F.4th 741, 754 (7th Cir. 2022) (holding that § 3553(f)(1) is to be read disjunctively). See also United States v. Garcon , 23 F.4th 1334 (11th Cir. 2022) (granting rehearing en banc in a case involving the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) ). 2 Because we find the Government's ... ...
-
Sutton v. Caro
... ROBIN SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. JOSE R. CARO et al., Defendants. No. 1:25-CV-03923 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division December 18, 2025 ... that criminal activity is afoot.” United States v ... Pace , 48 F.4th 741, 749 (7th Cir. 2022) (citing ... Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968)) ... ...
-
In re Stamps
... 644 B.R. 760 IN RE: Linda STAMPS, Debtor. Case No. 19 B 21730 United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. Signed September 30, 2022 644 B.R. 763 ... See., e.g., United States v. Pace , No. 21-2151, 48 F.4th 741, 753–54 (7th Cir. Sept. 9, 2022) (holding that an em-dash changed ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Fourth Circuit panel joins minority of circuits giving broad reading to FIRST-STEP-amended safety valve provision
...that having any one of the criminal history characteristics renders a defendant ineligible under § 3553(f)(1)), United States v. Pace, 48 F.4th 741 (7th Cir. 2022) (same), United States v. Pulsifer, 39 F.4th 1018 (8th Cir. 2022) (same), and United States v. Haynes, 55 F.4th 1075 (6th Cir. 2......
