United States v. Palmer, 4953.

Decision Date16 October 1933
Docket NumberNo. 4953.,4953.
Citation67 F.2d 146
PartiesUNITED STATES ex rel. MAJKA v. PALMER, District Director of Immigration.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

David Snow, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Dwight H. Green, U. S. Atty., and Austin Hall, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.

SPARKS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The statute under which the deportation proceedings herein involved were had provides that, "* * * any alien who was convicted, or who admits the commission, prior to entry, of a felony or other crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude * * * shall, upon the warrant of the Secretary of Labor, be taken into custody and deported. * * *" 39 Stat. 889 (8 USCA § 155). Appellant contends that there was no authority for the deportation since there was no showing that the act of perjury constituted a crime under the laws of Poland where the act was committed, and that, admitting that perjury is defined as a crime in the United States, such definition has no bearing outside the United States, and is not applicable where the act is committed outside its own territorial boundaries. Appellant, however, loses sight of section 1750 of the Revised Statutes (22 USCA § 131),1 which gives to every notarial act done before any consular officer within the limits of his consulate, the same force and effect as if done in the United States, and provides that in the case of perjury, the offender may be proceeded against in any district of the United States in the same manner as if the offense had been committed within the United States. Without going into the question raised by appellant as to whether or not the United States could have proceeded against him by means of extradition had he decided not to avail himself of the passport illegally obtained, and remained in Poland instead of coming to the United States, it seems clear to us that when he did enter the United States, thereby making use of the fraudulent passport for the very purpose for which the crime was committed, he placed himself within the control of its laws and subjected himself to whatever proceedings it might see fit to bring as the result of his criminal act. It therefore becomes immaterial to determine whether or not perjury is held to be a crime in Poland, since the crime admitted was committed against the United States. Being a crime involving moral turpitude it may be the basis for deportation proceedings. Kaneda v. United States (C. C. A.) 278 F. 694; Yoshimasa Nomura v. United States (C. C. A.) 297 F. 191.

Appellant also contends that even if his acts did...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Rocha v. United States
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 2, 1961
    ..."in only one instance has an alien been held accountable by the United States for a crime committed abroad." United States ex rel. Majka v. Palmer, 7 Cir., 1933, 67 F.2d 146. There the alien was ordered deported for having made false statements under oath to an American Consul abroad when a......
  • United States v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • March 29, 1960
    ...consul abroad was a crime, under the predecessor of § 1203, sufficient to support deportation proceedings (United States ex rel. Majka v. Palmer, 7 Cir., 1933, 67 F.2d 146). The court refused to consider the possibility of whether or not the United States might have had the power to seek th......
  • U.S. v. Schmucker-Bula.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 18, 1980
    ...288 F.2d 545, 548-49 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1961), Cert. denied, 366 U.S. 948, 81 S.Ct. 1902, 6 L.Ed.2d 1241; United States ex rel. Majka v. Palmer, 67 F.2d 146, 147 (7th Cir. 1933).In Brulay, also cited by the Government, jurisdiction was justified on the basis of the United States citizenship of......
  • United States v. Schlotfeldt
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 29, 1940
    ...turpitude, there can be no question,4 and the crime was completed when she made the false statement under oath. United States ex rel. Majka v. Palmer, 7 Cir., 67 F.2d 146, 147. But counsel for appellants argues that "The Inspector omitted the elements of wilfulness and of knowledge in his d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT