United States v. Past
Decision Date | 10 May 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 19225.,19225. |
Citation | 347 F.2d 7 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Howard PAST, Executor of the Estate of Edna C. Rosedale Ogg, Deceased, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robt. N. Anderson, Loring W. Post, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Thomas R. Sheridan, U. S. Atty., Loyal E. Keir, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Carl A. Stutsman, Jr., Stanley E. Tobin, Jack R. White, Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.
Appellee is the executor of the estate of Edna C. Rosedale Ogg, deceased, who died December 25, 1956. Appellee filed an action in the District Court for the Southern District of California for the return of federal estate taxes in the total sum of $126,505.16 ($108,817.62 being principal and $17,687.54 being interest) theretofore paid by appellee in said estate following the assessment of a deficiency in estate taxes in the above amount. The district court rendered a judgment in favor of appellee in the full amount and appellant filed a timely appeal. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The facts as shown by the record and the findings of the district court are set out below. The decedent and Harry E. Rosedale were married for twenty-five years. In 1954, because of marital difficulties, complicated by the fact that decedent was addicted to alcohol, each employed independent legal counsel for the purpose of negotiating a property settlement. All of the property owned by the Rosedales was held as community property in which under California law each was an equal owner. For many years prior to 1954 decedent and her husband Harry obtained most of their income from a nursery business developed and managed by Harry. Decedent took no active part in the operation of the business. The principal assets of the community consisted of the common stock in two wholly-owned corporations, the Monrovia Nursery Company and Rosedale's Nurseries, Inc. In addition, the Rosedales owned real property referred to as "Huntington Drive property," upon which Rosedale's Nurseries conducted its business; a private residence; numerous insurance policies; furnishings; personal effects; and cash. Decedent and Harry had three children of their marriage, the youngest being a boy of five years.
Certain findings of fact of the district court provided inter alia as follows:
On March 8, 1955, an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted to decedent and her husband, incorporating therein the property settlement agreement, and a final decree of divorce was granted March 13, 1956. Decedent remarried after the final decree and on December 25, 1956, was murdered by her then husband.
Harry died August 15, 1956.
In assessing a deficiency in decedent's estate tax, the government contended that the entire corpus of the trust at decedent's death valued at $642,788.66 should be included in decedents' estate, relying on 26 U.S.C. § 2036.
Section 2036 provides in part as follows:
26 U.S.C. § 2043 provides in part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bernards v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Bongard)
...that would have been drawn into the gross estate absent the transfer”), revg. 105 T.C. 252, 1995 WL 564078 (1995); United States v. Past, 347 F.2d 7, 12 (9th Cir.1965) (“The value of what the decedent received under the trust must be measured against the value of the property she transferre......
-
Estate of McLendon v. Commissioner
...(1987), affd. [90-1 USTC ¶ 60,010] 897 F.2d 516 (Fed. Cir. 1990), in conjunction with United States v. Past [65-1 USTC ¶ 12,317], 347 F.2d 7 (9th Cir. 1965); United States v. Allen [61-2 USTC ¶ 12,032], 293 F.2d 916 (10th Cir. 1961); and Estate of Gregory v. Commissioner, supra, to support ......
-
Wheeler v. U.S.
...actuarial (date-of-election) value of her life estate in the decedent spouse's community property share. Id. But see United States v. Past, 347 F.2d 7, 13-14 (9th Cir.1965) (stating that the date-of-election value of the amount the surviving spouse receives under a trust must be measured ag......
-
United States v. Gordon
...at the time of the exchange to be the alternative most in accord with the true nature of the transaction. See United States v. Past, 9 Cir. 1965, 347 F.2d 7, 13 at footnote 4; Estate of Lillian B. Gregory, 1963, 39 T.C. 1012, ...