United States v. Patti, 13585.

Decision Date27 June 1961
Docket NumberNo. 13585.,13585.
Citation291 F.2d 745
PartiesUNITED STATES of America v. Charles A. PATTI, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Charles A. Patti, pro se.

Chester A. Weidenburner, U. S. Atty., Sidney M. Franzblau, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the District of New Jersey denying a motion to vacate the criminal judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and a correction of the court's order in its sentence from "consecutive with" to "consecutive to." We have given the appellant's claim, which he has made without the help of counsel, careful attention. There is no merit to the points he raises. If changed circumstances entitled him to clemency that must come from other than the Judicial Department of the Government.

The judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Sapp, In re
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 27, 1997
    ...3001, 3015, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983); Solesbee v. Balkcom, 339 U.S. 9, 12, 70 S.Ct. 457, 458, 94 L.Ed. 604 (1950); United States v. Patti, 291 F.2d 745, 746 (3rd Cir.1961); Binion v. United States Dep't.of Justice, 695 F.2d 1189, 1190 (9th Cir.1983); Hatch v. Oklahoma, 92 F.3d 1012, 1016 (10th......
  • Beacham v. Braterman, Civ. No. 68-748.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • October 20, 1969
    ...117, 223 F.2d 582 (1955), rev'd on other grounds without opinion, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); United States v. Patti, 291 F.2d 745 (3rd Cir. 1961); and Davis v. State of North Carolina, 339 F.2d 770 (4th Cir. 1964), rev'd on other grounds, 384 U.S. 737, 86 S.Ct. 1761, ......
  • Cohen v. Ciccone
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • September 28, 1970
    ...entitle a prisoner to clemency, "that must come from other than the Judicial Department of the Government." United States v. Patti (C.A.3), 291 F.2d 745, 746. Further, if this petition can be considered a successive petition for habeas corpus seeking review of the Parole Board's refusal to ......
  • United States v. Barillas
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 28, 1961
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT