United States v. Pheribo
| Decision Date | 09 June 1965 |
| Docket Number | Docket 29474.,No. 425,425 |
| Citation | 346 F.2d 559 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles S. PHERIBO, Petitioner-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Charles S. Pheribo, pro se.
Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York, Robert J. McGuire, John S. Martin, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
Charles S. Pheribo and five accomplices were indicted for stealing and conspiring to steal merchandise from a truck traveling in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Four of the defendants entered guilty pleas to one or more of the indictment's four counts, but Pheribo and another defendant, William Johnson, elected to stand trial. Based largely on the incriminating testimony of two accomplices, James Williams and James Lovejoy, the jury found Pheribo guilty of the three substantive counts, but returned a verdict of acquittal on the conspiracy count.1 The conviction was affirmed by this Court, United States v. Johnson, 331 F.2d 281, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari, 379 U.S. 905, 85 S.Ct. 196, 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964). Pheribo then brought this § 2255 proceeding to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence, contending that the trial was vitiated by the Government's knowing use of the allegedly perjured testimony of co-defendant Lovejoy, who purportedly lied in denying that he had been promised leniency for testifying. After studying the full record, but without holding an evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied the requested relief.
The very papers submitted by Pheribo clearly indicate that Lovejoy was thoroughly cross-examined at the trial, and his possible bias, prejudice or motive for testifying — stemming from expectations of leniency in sentencing — was fully brought home to the jurors. The credibility question thus amply presented must have been resolved adversely to Pheribo and may not, without more, be reopened on this motion.
In any event, and even were we permitted to review that question, our careful reading of the record has uncovered not a scintilla of evidence that the Government promised Lovejoy a more lenient sentence for testifying at Pheribo's trial. Cf. Napue v. People of State of Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L. Ed.2d 1217 (1959). On the contrary, the prosecutor told Lovejoy that "the Government at no time makes...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Paroutian v. United States
...U.S.App.D.C. 79, 311 F.2d 128, 132 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 946, 83 S.Ct. 1541, 10 L.Ed.2d 701 (1963). See also, United States v. Pheribo, 346 F.2d 559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 871, 86 S.Ct. 149, 15 L.Ed.2d 110 Petitioner's assertion that his sentence must be vacated because ......
-
State v. Matera
...cert. denied, 358 U.S. 854, 79 S.Ct. 83, 3 L.Ed.2d 87 (1958).15 256 F.2d 483, 484 (CCA 1st 1958).16 268 F.2d 135, 137 (CCA 8th 1959).17 346 F.2d 559, 560 (CCA 7th), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 871, 86 S.Ct. 149, 15 L.Ed.2d 110 (1965).18 266 F.2d 670 (CCA 2d), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 870, 80 S.Ct.......
-
Paroutian v. United States
...the Government knew that De Almeida's testimony was perjured required, on this record, an evidentiary hearing. See also United States v. Pheribo, 346 F.2d 559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 871, 86 S.Ct. 149, 15 L.Ed.2d 110 Appellant also claims that there was suppression of Jencks Act m......
-
Saunders v. Buckhoe
... ... No. 16029 ... United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit ... June 10, 1965. Richard Saunders, in pro ... ...