United States v. Phillips
| Docket Number | 11-30195 |
| Decision Date | 26 December 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
95 cases
-
United States v. Christensen
...1239 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2011). We have held that there is no constitutional right to have a jury decide forfeiture. United States v. Phillips , 704 F.3d 754, 769–70 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Libretti v. United States , 516 U.S. 29, 49, 116 S.Ct. 356, 133 L.Ed.2d 271 (1995) ). Similarly, we conclu......
-
United States v. Christensen
...1239 n. 2 (9th Cir.2011). We have held that there is no constitutional right to have a jury decide forfeiture. United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754, 769–70 (9th Cir.2012) (citing Libretti v. United States, 516 U.S. 29, 49, 116 S.Ct. 356, 133 L.Ed.2d 271 (1995) ). Similarly, we concluded ......
-
United States v. Sigillito
...); United States v. Torres, 531 Fed.Appx. 964, 973 n. 3 (11th Cir.2013) (noting in dicta that Libretti controls); United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754, 769 (9th Cir.2012) ( Southern Union ); United States v. Day, 700 F.3d 713, 733 (4th Cir.2012) ( Southern Union ). We join these circuits......
-
United States v. Evans
...like all defendants subject to the supervised release conditions, has "an additional layer of protection." United States v. Phillips , 704 F.3d 754, 768 n.13 (9th Cir. 2012). If Evans is charged with violation of a condition of supervised release, he may raise an as-applied challenge in dis......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
..., 661 F.3d 189 (4th Cir. 2011), §§3:21, 9:16 United States v. Peterson , 629 F.3d 432 (4th Cir. 2011), §4:28 United States v. Phillips , 704 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2012), §§3:40, 6:23 United States v. Piazza , 647 F.3d 559 (5th Cir. 2011), §3:10 United States v. Pileggi , 703 F.3d 675 (4th Cir.......
-
8 Criminal Forfeiture Proceedings
...to criminal forfeiture because there is no statutory maximum penalty and the court did not overrule Libretti. United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754, 769-771 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v. Day, 700 F.3d 713, 732-733 (4th Cir. 2012). Thus, it appears that, in spite of Apprendi/Blakely/Bo......
-
Fraud
...sequestration violation was warranted. §6:23 To Prove Mail Fraud, the Government Has to Show You Used the Mail United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2012) Our brave new world of internet technology is encouraging innovation of all kinds. Innovation of new ways to interact with e......
-
Evidence & Trials
.... . . Complete text in §6:21, Fraud. §3:40 To Prove Mail Fraud, the Government Has to Show You Used the Mail United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2012) Our brave new world of internet technology is encouraging innovation of all kinds—innovation of new ways to interact with each......