United States v. Pinna, 11499.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | MAJOR, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit |
| Citation | 229 F.2d 216 |
| Parties | The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy PINNA, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 11499.,11499. |
| Decision Date | 26 January 1956 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
40 cases
-
United States v. Beigel, 65 Cr. 174.
...States v. Monica, 295 F.2d 400 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 953, 82 S.Ct. 395, 7 L.Ed.2d 386 (1962); United States v. Pinna, 229 F.2d 216 (7th Cir. 31 See United States v. Gregory, 309 F. 2d 536-538 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied sub nom. Sumpter v. United States, 373 U.S. 953, 83 S......
-
Manning v. United States, 17731.
...of possession by direct evidence; proof of possession by circumstantial evidence is sufficient. United States v. Pinna, 7 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 216. Appellant argues that the court committed reversible error in giving the Government's requested charge that: "Now the court instructs the jury ......
-
Rodella v. United States, 16846.
...F.2d 355, at page 360, 31 A.L.R.2d 409; United States v. La Rocca, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 859, 860; United States v. Pinna, 7 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 216, 218; United 286 F.2d 313 States v. Maroy, 7 Cir., 1957, 248 F.2d 663, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 931, 78 S.Ct. 412, 2 L.Ed.2d 414; United S......
-
State v. Brown, A--707
...of possession may be shown by circumstantial proof. With this we agree; in fact, this Court has so held. United States v. Pinna, 7 Cir., 229 F.2d 216, 218. But no court, so far as we are aware, has held that proof of possession by one person may be established by circumstantial evidence whe......
Request a trial to view additional results