United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California Mineral County, Nevada v. Public Utilities Commission of California, Nos. 205
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | REED |
| Citation | 345 U.S. 295,73 S.Ct. 706,97 L.Ed. 1020 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al. MINERAL COUNTY, NEVADA v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al |
| Docket Number | Nos. 205,206 |
| Decision Date | 06 April 1953 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
193 practice notes
-
State ex rel. Utilities v. Carolina Power, No. 649A03.
...for resale in interstate commerce, while the [FPA] established federal jurisdiction over such sales." United States v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 U.S. 295, 311, 73 S.Ct. 706, 716, 97 L.Ed. 1020, 1035 (1953). Since then, United States Supreme Court decisions have made clear that FERC has plenar......
-
United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven, No. 15462
...That process seems to me not interpretation of a statute but creation of a statute." United States v. Public Utilities Commission, 345 U.S. 295, 319, 73 S.Ct. 706, 719, 97 L.Ed. 1020 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring). It is simply undemocratic for any public officers other than the elected r......
-
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly, No. 86-5322
...Power Co. v. New Hampshire, 455 U.S. at 341, 102 S.Ct. at 1102 (1982) (quoting United States v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California, 345 U.S. 295, 304, 73 S.Ct. 706, 712, 97 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1953)). Given that "for a state regulation to be removed from the reach of the dormant Commerce Claus......
-
Jenkins v. Entergy Corp., No. 13-05-035-CV.
...not preserve "exclusive state regulation of wholesale hydroelectric sales across state borders." See United States v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 U.S. 295, 310, 73 S.Ct. 706, 97 L.Ed. 1020 (1953) (citing 16 U.S.C. § 824(a)). State power does not extend to an interstate sale "in wholesale quanti......
Request a trial to view additional results
189 cases
-
State ex rel. Utilities v. Carolina Power, No. 649A03.
...for resale in interstate commerce, while the [FPA] established federal jurisdiction over such sales." United States v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 U.S. 295, 311, 73 S.Ct. 706, 716, 97 L.Ed. 1020, 1035 (1953). Since then, United States Supreme Court decisions have made clear that FERC has plenar......
-
United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven, No. 15462
...That process seems to me not interpretation of a statute but creation of a statute." United States v. Public Utilities Commission, 345 U.S. 295, 319, 73 S.Ct. 706, 719, 97 L.Ed. 1020 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring). It is simply undemocratic for any public officers other than the elected r......
-
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly, No. 86-5322
...Power Co. v. New Hampshire, 455 U.S. at 341, 102 S.Ct. at 1102 (1982) (quoting United States v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California, 345 U.S. 295, 304, 73 S.Ct. 706, 712, 97 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1953)). Given that "for a state regulation to be removed from the reach of the dormant Commerce Claus......
-
Jenkins v. Entergy Corp., No. 13-05-035-CV.
...not preserve "exclusive state regulation of wholesale hydroelectric sales across state borders." See United States v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 345 U.S. 295, 310, 73 S.Ct. 706, 97 L.Ed. 1020 (1953) (citing 16 U.S.C. § 824(a)). State power does not extend to an interstate sale "in wholesale quanti......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Minimizing Constitutional Risk in State Energy Policy: A Survey of the State of the Law
...Stat. 871. 116. New England Power Co. v. New Hampshire, 455 U.S. 331, 340 (1982) ( citing United States v. Public Utils. Comm’n of Cal., 345 U.S. 295, 311 (1953)); see also Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. hornburg, 476 U.S. 953, 956 (1986) (stating that FERC “has exclusive jurisdiction over ......
-
Legal After-Shocks on the Energy Seismograph: Judicial Prohibition of Recent State Regulation and Promotion of Power
...J., concurring in the judgment). 22. New England Power Co. , 455 U.S. at 340 ( citing United States v. Public Utils. Comm’n of Cal., 345 U.S. 295, 311 (1953). See also Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. hornburg, 476 U.S. 953, 956 (1986) (stating that the Commission “has exclusive jurisdiction ......
-
The Congressional Record: Fact or Fiction of the Legislative Process
...Devices, 346 U.S. 441 (1953), wherein he cites floorstatements of a number of congressmen as well as the House committee report. 39 345 U.S. 295 at 321 Neuberger, op. cit. 991 be that a committee report is accepted by the membership at large or thata statement of the floor manager of a bill......