United States v. Rizzo 146,157

Decision Date14 October 1935
Docket NumberNo. 272,272
Citation56 S.Ct. 124,80 L.Ed. 394,296 U.S. 559
PartiesThe UNITED STATES of America, petitioner, v. Frank RIZZO, Claimant of 146,157 gallons of alcohol. 1
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Homer S. Cummings, Atty. Gen., for the United States.

No opinion filed in court below.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.

1 Subsequently to the decision of the United States Supreme Court, 294 U. S. 709, 55 S. Ct. 406, 79 L. Ed. 1244, denying certiorari to review the decision of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 73 F.(2d) 1010, a petition was filed by the government for a lien for taxes on the fund involved. This petition was denied by the Circuit Court of Appeals by order June 4, 1935, without opinion. The government seeks review of this order.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Harrison v. United States, 20280
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • May 18, 1967
  • United States v. Rizzo
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1936
    ...a misconstruction of the statutes concerning tax liens and a departure from the usual course of proceedings being charged. 296 U.S. 559, 56 S.Ct. 124, 80 L.Ed. 394. First. Rizzo does not attempt here to support the order on the ground stated by the Court of Appeals. Nor could he well do so.......
  • People ex rel. Pincus v. Adams
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 1937
    ... ... statutes and are to be found on the statute books of many of the states. Such procedure was not unknown to the common law. People v. Gates, 13 ... In Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 14 S.Ct. 410, 38 L.Ed. 208, it was held that an ... ...
  • Commonwealth Trust Co of Pittsburgh v. Bradford
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1936
    ...The order granting this certiorari limited our consideration 'to the question of jurisdiction and its appropriate exercise.' 296 U.S. 566, 56 S.Ct. 124, 80 L.Ed. 399. The facts, not in serious dispute, were fully set out by the Circuit Court of Appeals. It will suffice now to restate those ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT