United States v. Robinson
Decision Date | 22 January 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 12321.,12321. |
Citation | 170 F.2d 578 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. ROBINSON. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John H. Tappan and Percy C. Fountain U. S. Atty., both of Mobile, Ala., for appellant.
J. Edward Thornton, of Mobile, Ala., for appellee.
Before McCORD and LEE, Circuit Judges, and MIZE, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the court for the Southern District of Alabama. Appellee, George H. Robinson, filed his libel against the United States and sought recovery of $3,400 under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., for maintenance and cure as provided by the act. He averred that he was a seaman on the ship "American Fisher" and that his vessel was employed and operated as a merchant vessel by the government, acting through the War Shipping Adminstration. He alleged that he shipped on it about the 26th of October, 1945 for a voyage from Baltimore to a foreign port and return, and that while on the vessel, engaged in his duties, he was injured. He further alleged that by the Clarification Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1291, the United States had consented to be sued and that his claim had been administratively denied.
The government answered, admitting that plaintiff was a seaman on the vessel from October 26, 1945, to November 3, 1945, but denies that he was employed thereafter. It admits that he was injured while on the vessel on October 26 and remained on the vessel until November 3, 1945, and was then removed from the vessel and placed in a hospital at the United States Naval Operating Base at Guantanamo, Cuba, where he remained until November 20, 1945, and was then transferred to the Naval hospital at Key West, Florida. The government further set up a defense that the physical condition of the plaintiff in no way resulted from any injury received by him while a seaman on the Steamship "American Fisher"; that it had reimbursed him for his expenses for maintenance and cure through October 1, 1946; that the disease with which he is now suffering is incurable and that all improvement in his condition as reasonably may be expected to result from nursing, care and medical treatment was had on or before October 1, 1946, and that there was no further duty to provide treatment, nursing or care.
An agreed statement of facts was made at the trial as to many of the material facts, which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Solet v. M/V CAPT. HV DUFRENE, Civ. A. No. 67-1713.
...by the reasonable cost of that maintenance and cure to which (the plaintiff) is entitled at the time of the trial. United States v. Robinson, 5 Cir. 1948, 170 F.2d 578. This means the reasonable cost of meals and lodging ashore of a type that the injured seaman would normally require." Huds......
-
Leh v. GENERAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
... ... Civ. A. No. 20531-WM ... United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division ... August 30, ... ...
-
Gauthier v. Crosby Marine Service, Inc.
...Albano v. United States, 98 F.Supp. 150 (D.Mass. 1951); see Robinson v. United States, 76 F.Supp. 422 (S.D.Ala.), aff'd, 170 F.2d 578 (5th Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 923, 70 S.Ct. 611, 94 L.Ed. 1345 (1950). The testimony in this case indicated that Gauthier did not ever reach maximu......
-
Hudspeth v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.
...by the reasonable cost of that maintenance and cure to which the plaintiff is entitled at the time of the trial." United States v. Robinson, 5th Cir. 1948, 170 F.2d 578. This means the reasonable cost of meals and lodging ashore of a type that the injured seaman would normally require. The ......