United States v. Rochin-Silva, 031907 FED09, 06-10507
|Party Name:||UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODRIGO ROCHIN-SILVA, Defendant - Appellant.|
|Judge Panel:||Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||March 19, 2007|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted March 12, 2007 [**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CR-05-01453-CKJ
Rodrigo Rochin-Silva appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rochin-Silva's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district courts judgment is AFFIRMED.
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP