United States v. Rodriguez

Docket Number10-1984
Decision Date28 March 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
96 cases
  • Forestier-Figueroa v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • March 30, 2015
    ...known at the time, counsel's choice was so patently unreasonablethat no competent attorney would have made it." United States v. Rodriguez, 675 F.3d 48, 56 (1st Cir. 2012), quoting Tevlin v. Spencer, 621 F.3d 59, 66 (1st Cir. 2010), which in turn quotes Knight v. Spencer, 447 F.3d 6, 15 (1s......
  • Soc'y of the Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Inc. v. Denver
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • August 2, 2012
    ...they are. We have often admonished counsel that “it is not the job of this court to do [appellant's] work for him.” United States v. Rodriguez, 675 F.3d 48, 59 (1st Cir.2012); United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.1990). In contrast to the cases to which appellant cites, which s......
  • Contreras v. Somoza
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • June 23, 2015
    ...v. Washington, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. 2052 ); see United States v. Valerio, 676 F.3d 237, 246 (1st Cir.2012) ; United States v. Rodriguez, 675 F.3d 48, 56 (1st Cir.2012) ; Pinillos v. U.S., 990 F.Supp.2d at 94. The test includes a "strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within ......
  • Jaynes v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • January 13, 2015
    ...a valid ineffectiveness claim. Because each of the individual claim fails, so too must the collective claims. United States v. Rodriguez, 675 F.3d 48, 66 n.20 (1st Cir. 2012) ("Because none of Rodriguez's claimed errors resulted in any substantial prejudice there was no cumulative error.");......
  • Get Started for Free