United States v. Segelman
| Decision Date | 08 April 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 11252.,11252. |
| Citation | 212 F.2d 88 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. SEGELMAN. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Irving Segelman, pro se., for appellant.
John W. McIlvaine, U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., Dail E. Sloan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brownsville, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
The provisions of Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, may not be employed as the appellant, Segelman, seeks to make use of them, in order to correct alleged errors committed by the court below during Segelman's trial. The sentences imposed upon Segelman were not imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and the court had jurisdiction to impose the sentences. Segelman appealed from the judgments against him, D.C., 86 F. Supp. 114, but his appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. No question cognizable under Section 2255 was before the court below. 117 F. Supp. 507. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Gold
...discretion as to matters which are submitted to a grand jury, United States v. Segelman, 86 F.Supp. 114, 126 (W.D.Pa. 1949), aff'd 212 F.2d 88 (3d Cir. 1954); and it is recognized that a prosecutor "is not merely an advocate. He or she is `an administrator of justice' as well." United State......
-
United States v. Clayton
...all others from its operation may be inferred. 5 E. g., United States v. Segelman, D.C. W.D.Pa.1953, 117 F.Supp. 507, affirmed 3 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 88; Ex parte Lamar, 2 Cir., 1921, 274 F. 160, 24 A. L.R. 864. 6 Rehberg v. United States, 5 Cir., 1949, 174 F.2d 121; United States v. Carter......
-
State v. Jarrett
...loc. cit. 985; Rowley v. United States, 8 Cir., 191 F.2d 949, 951; United States v. Segelman, D.C., 117 F.Supp. 507, 508, affirmed, 3 Cir., 212 F.2d 88; Jordan v. United States District Court, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 233 F.2d 362, 365[7-9], 352 U.S. 904, 77 S.Ct. 151, 1 L.Ed.2d Section 560.120......
-
United States v. Robinson, 71-CR-46.
...1952); United States v. Brown, 429 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Segelman, 117 F.Supp. 507 (W.D.Pa. 1953), aff'd. 212 F.2d 88 (3rd Cir. 1954). 1 Sitting as District Judge for Western District of Wisconsin by designation of Chief Justice of United ...