United States v. Sharpe

Decision Date30 August 1963
Docket NumberNo. 15129.,15129.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie A. SHARPE, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Edward L. Douglas, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Milton J. Trumbauer, Jr., Detroit, Mich. (Lawrence Gubow, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, and KENT and FOX, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Shortly before noon on Wednesday, November 15, 1961, Agent Edmund Irvin, of the United States Bureau of Narcotics, received an anonymous telephone call from an unidentified female.

The informant told Officer Irvin she was an ex-girl friend of Willie Sharpe (aka Churchill). She claimed Sharpe was then selling heroin in capsule form out of his apartment, No. 14, at 4825 Brush Street, in Detroit, Michigan.

She gave a description of Sharpe and his telephone number. The telephone number and the address were verified by Agent Irvin.

On the same day, Agents Irvin and Robert David went to 4825 Brush Street. They entered the apartment building and posted themselves on the stairway one floor above the entrance to Apartment 14.

From this vantage point they observed what they termed several suspected addicts entering and leaving apartment No. 14. The agents went to the back of the apartment building and watched the kitchen door into apartment 14. Shortly thereafter they saw two suspected addicts entering and leaving the apartment's kitchen door.

Following this, the Agents approached the vicinity of the kitchen door and saw two garbage cans, one directly behind the door leading into Apartment 14. Agent Irvin looked into this garbage can and found several empty No. 5 pink gelatin capsules, a pin and an empty box of No. 5 gelatin capsules, together with a hypodermic needle. These, according to the testimony of the narcotics officers, are common utilities of the heroin trade.

On November 16, at about the same time as the preceding day, Agent Irvin received another telephone call from the same unidentified female.

She informed Irvin that Willie Sharpe was to leave his apartment with a quantity of heroin, which he was to deliver at approximately noon, and that he usually travelled by jitney or cab.

Some time shortly after noon, the Agents saw a man fitting "the description provided by the unknown person on the telephone, leaving the rear door of Apartment 14, descending to the ground, and walked over to Hancock, where he entered a cab and was lost from sight." (Tr. 20)

On November 17, after midnight, about 1:00 or 1:30 in the morning, Agents Irvin and David returned to a surveillance of 4825 Brush Street. They saw several persons entering and leaving the back door of Apartment 14, and they stopped one of them. However, this person ran away, dropping a hypodermic needle and an eyedropper. These, according to the officers' testimony, are also common instruments used by addicts.

The Narcotic Agents then approached the back door of Apartment 14 and after listening, heard two separate voices speaking the vernacular common to the narcotics trade. The Agents were unable to identify either of the voices.

On the morning of November 17, Narcotics Agent Irvin arrived at his office in the Federal Building around 10:00 or 10:15. He received another telephone call from the same unidentified female. She stated that Sharpe was "now capping up, and would, approximately by noon, be rid of the heroin, or the stuff." (Tr. 25)

Agent Irvin received this call at about 10:30.

Next, Agents Irvin and David "proceeded to the area where we were joined by officers of the Detroit Police Department" (Tr. 26), who were contacted after the Agents reached the apartment area.

The officers reached the apartment building after 11:00 A.M.

The Federal Narcotics Agents and members of the Detroit Police Department entered the apartment building at 4825 Brush Street and approached the front door of Apartment 14. Their purpose was to place Willie Sharpe under arrest for possession of narcotics.

When the Agents and officers heard voices inside, Agent Irvin knocked on the door. He declared: "Irvin, Federal Narcotics Agent."

Next, there was a noise near the door and then the statement from within, "Quick, the back door."

Straightway Agent Irvin forcibly entered the apartment.

Upon entering, Agent Irvin went into the kitchen and placed Willie Sharpe, Charles Davis and Jonnie Mae Hill under arrest.

Willie Sharpe was at a small kitchen table, on which there was a plate and a quantity of white powder, later identified as heroin.

Appellant states the questions involved to be:

(1) Whether there can be a valid arrest without a warrant by federal officers in the absence of the requirements of stating their identity and purpose for demanding admission prior to breaking into a private dwelling, and whether the evidence seized in the search incident to such an arrest be admissible?

(2) Do the facts and circumstances in this case which tend to "verify" the information received by federal officers from an anonymous source, constitute probable cause for the arrest of the defendant without a warrant?

On the question of validity of arrest and search and seizure, the issue is the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • United States v. Squella-Avendano
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 25, 1971
    ...Cir. 1969); Bailey v. United States, 386 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1967); Cali v. United States, 338 F.2d 974 (1st Cir. 1964); United States v. Sharpe, 322 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1963). Spinelli fully supports this analysis. In discussing the effects of the FBI's independent investigative efforts, the C......
  • State v. Rose
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1975
    ...380 U.S. 102, 110, 87 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684; Jones v. United States, supra, 362 U.S. 269-70, 80 S.Ct. 725; United States v. Sharpe, 322 F.2d 117, 119-20 (6th Cir.). Where, however, there is no such corroboration, the detail required of the information provided by the information concern......
  • Bailey v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 1, 1967
    ...without it. Lane v. United States, 321 F.2d 573 (5th Cir. 1963); Cali v. United States, 338 F.2d 974 (1st Cir. 1964); United States v. Sharpe, 322 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1963). Appellants arrived in Roma in accordance with the information which had been received.1 During the five hour surveilla......
  • People v. Strelow
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 17, 1980
    ...United States v. Alexander, 346 F.2d 561 (CA 6, 1965), cert. den., 382 U.S. 993, 86 S.Ct. 575, 15 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966); United States v. Sharpe, 322 F.2d 117 (CA 6, 1963); United States v. Freeman, 144 F.Supp. 669 (D.D.C., 1956). At first blush these cases appear to support the entry made in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT